Unlock stock picks and a broker-level newsfeed that powers Wall Street.

Howard Schultz just showed he doesn't have a grasp of the issues

In This Article:

AUSTIN, TEXAS - MARCH 09: Businessman and presidential candidate Howard Schultz speaks live on stage during the 2019 SXSW Conference And Festival at the Austin Convention Center on March 09, 2019 in Austin, Texas. (Photo by Jim Bennett/WireImage)
AUSTIN, TEXAS - MARCH 09: Businessman and presidential candidate Howard Schultz speaks live on stage during the 2019 SXSW Conference And Festival at the Austin Convention Center on March 09, 2019 in Austin, Texas. (Photo by Jim Bennett/WireImage)

AUSTIN—The face of the world’s biggest coffee chain and a possible independent presidential candidate who attacks both parties came to a city teeming with independent coffee shops and liberal Democrats and did not get booed.

In that respect, Starbucks (SBUX) chairman emeritus Howard Schultz’s Saturday-morning talk at the SXSW conference here went better than expected.

But in terms of giving people a reason to vote for him someday, Schultz served watery decaf. His prescription for America, to the extent that it exists, amounts to cutting the deficit and trying to get more companies to act like Starbucks.

A systemic critique

The core justification for the maybe-candidacy Schultz launched five weeks ago bears a striking resemblance to President Trump’s campaign message: The system is broken, and I alone can fix it.

Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz speaks at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind., Thursday, Feb. 7, 2019. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy)
Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz speaks at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind., Thursday, Feb. 7, 2019. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy)

“The two-party system is broken, dysfunctional, and in need of great repair,” Schultz said to his onstage interviewer, NBC media reporter Dylan Byers.

Schultz despises the other wealthy businessman to make that claim—he repeatedly denounced Trump for a lack of leadership, character and dignity—but called Democrats just as bad for leaning ever leftward.

"You can't try and solve one extreme with the other,” he said, calling Democratic support for such policies as single-payer health care and a Green New Deal “socialism.”

“Let's propose things that are true, that are honest, that are sincere, that are realistic,” he said of anti-global-warming agenda championed most publicly by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D.-N.Y.).

A Schultz victory, meanwhile, would stop that separatism and free “good Republicans and Democrats” from having to knuckle under to party bosses. “If an independent president gets elected, you're going to see those good people move outside their ideology.”

On health care and socialism

But what would a President Schultz actually do? It’s clear he would strive to reduce the national debt, which he called “immoral.” But his vague answers to basic questions about health care don’t speak well to the depth of his dedication.

“Every American should have the right to affordable health care,” he declared. Then he suggested that doing more than amending the Affordable Care Act—for instance, letting the government negotiate drug prices—would be socialism.

The Anthem Inc. website is displayed for a photograph on an Apple Inc. iPhone in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Saturday, April 21, 2018. Anthem Inc. is benefiting from a decision last year to retreat from the Affordable Care Act's health insurance markets and raise prices significantly. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images
The Anthem Inc. website is displayed for a photograph on an Apple Inc. iPhone in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Saturday, April 21, 2018. Anthem Inc. is benefiting from a decision last year to retreat from the Affordable Care Act's health insurance markets and raise prices significantly. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images

“There's nothing free in America,” he said of Medicare For All proposals. “Taxes for everyone are going to have to go up.”

That is true. But as a former chief executive of a company that provides health insurance for its workers, Schultz should know well that expecting private companies to subsidize health care for their employees isn’t free either.