In This Article:
The Trump administration's latest push to end government conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac has the housing world abuzz – and for good reason.
According to the National Association of Realtors, these government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) guarantee about 70% of U.S. mortgages. Any alterations to their structure could send shock waves through the housing market, impacting everything from mortgage rates to affordability.
Don't Miss:
-
This Jeff Bezos-backed startup will allow you to become a landlord in just 10 minutes, with minimum investments as low as $100 for properties like the Byer House from Stranger Things.
-
Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — you can become an investor for $0.80 per share today.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been under federal control since 2008 when the financial crisis pushed them into conservatorship. They are critical to the housing market because they buy mortgages from lenders, package them into securities and sell them to investors.
This process allows banks to maintain the liquidity they need to continue issuing loans that help millions of Americans obtain long-term fixed-rate mortgages.
But it's not just a question of turning control over to private entities. This move could remake the entire housing finance system. Supporters, including former Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) director Mark Calabria, say it's essential.
He has emphasized that systemic issues within Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac need to be addressed during conservatorship.
See Also: ‘Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest TODAY for just $0.26/share with a $1000 minimum.
Speaking at the 2019 National Association of Realtors legislative conference, Calabria noted, “What Congress decided in HERA [the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008] was, if ... Fannie or Freddie got in trouble, they enter conservatorship, we fix the problem and they move on.”
Privatization advocates argue it would reduce taxpayer risks and bring competition into the market. Critics, however, caution that it could come at a high price for borrowers. Without the implicit guarantee from the government, investors might grow more wary of mortgage-backed securities, forcing up yields and, ultimately, mortgage rates.
Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics, is one voice of concern. "House prices would tumble and the 30-year fixed mortgage rate could surge past 7%," Zandi told Fortune in a past interview.