Hotspots where households have ‘most and least financial resilience’ identified

In This Article:

A study into households’ financial resilience has placed Wokingham, Elmbridge and St Albans at the top.

At the other end of the spectrum, Hull, Nottingham and Liverpool were at the bottom of the rankings, published in Hargreaves Lansdown’s savings and resilience barometer.

The research breaks down aspects of household finances to a local level, using data such as the Wealth and Assets Survey covering Britain and the Financial Conduct Authority’s Financial Lives Survey.

Economic modelling by Oxford Economics was used in the study, which covers several aspects of financial resilience among households, such as savings levels, being on track for retirement and debts.

While incomes form part of financial resilience, housing affordability is also an issue, because areas with a lack of affordability mean fewer people are able to buy a home and build their resilience this way, the report said.

Sarah Coles, head of personal finance, Hargreaves Lansdown said: “There’s a vast gulf between the capitals of resilience and the tougher areas where money is stretched and the future looks much harder.

“Among the top 10 most resilient local authorities, 79% of households have enough cash left at the end of the month to be resilient, compared to 54% among the bottom 10.”

Wokingham in Berkshire and Elmbridge in Surrey benefit from high scores for incomes and homeownership levels, researchers said.

A general view of St Albans Cathedral
A view of St Albans Cathedral as the city was ranked third overall in Hargreaves Lansdown’s financial resilience barometer (Chris Radburn/PA)

St Albans in Hertfordshire was placed third because of factors such as its high average earnings, leaving money available for long-term planning, and a relatively high proportion of investors living there.

Meanwhile Hull was ranked at the bottom as households had relatively low levels of money leftover at the end of each month and also fared relatively poorly in terms of having emergency savings and pension savings.

Looking just at northern England specifically, the Ribble Valley was placed top for financial resilience, coming 39th overall.

The largely rural area, known for its picturesque villages and gastropubs, scored particularly well for savings, pensions and home ownership.

It was followed by South Lakeland (43rd overall), which also scored well for savings and pensions, and Harrogate (in 46th place), which performed favourably for incomes.

A view of Harrogate town centre
Harrogate performed relatively well for incomes in the financial resilience study (Lynne Cameron/PA)

Bromsgrove is the resilience capital of the Midlands (ranked 28th overall), performing well for savings, pensions and home ownership. It was followed by Stratford-upon-Avon (29). Meanwhile Rushcliffe made number 33, Harborough 34 with Warwick placed at 44.

East Dunbartonshire (placed 24th overall), was identified as having the highest overall resilience in Scotland.