Unlock stock picks and a broker-level newsfeed that powers Wall Street. Upgrade Now
Hooters’ Problems Pose a Test for Securitizations

(Bloomberg) -- A form of Wall Street financial engineering that’s become popular with chain restaurants is about to get a serious stress test, as Hooters heads toward bankruptcy and TGI Friday’s remains mired in one.

Most Read from Bloomberg

Whole-business securitizations took off over a decade ago, allowing retail chains to raise money more cheaply than in junk bond markets by promising future cashflow from their franchised restaurants and stores. There are now about $36 billion of the bonds outstanding, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.

The bonds drew investors because of their apparent safety. Backed by most of a parent company’s assets and cashflow, they are, in theory, relatively well protected even if the company runs into serious trouble. Most earn investment-grade ratings that are five to six notches higher than similar corporate deals, according to a 2019 report from S&P Global Ratings.

Now, big problems faced by some companies that borrowed money through these securitizations are putting those assumptions to the test. While investors aren’t offloading the bonds en masse and most of the debt is still performing well, risk premiums on the securities have widened a few basis points this year even as spreads on other asset-backed assets have generally narrowed.

Hooters of America, the restaurant franchise known for its servers’ skimpy uniforms, raised $315 million in 2021 through the sale of whole business securitizations. But declining foot traffic has since caused liquidity issues for the company, and it’s now working with creditors on a plan to potentially restructure in bankruptcy, Bloomberg reported last month.

Investors that own Hooters’ securitized bonds are still getting regular interest payments, but they’re increasingly expecting that they will need to let Hooters repay their principal at a later date in order to avoid putting the company through a cash crunch that would jeopardize its ability to repay them completely, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.

If the hands of bondholders are forced, one reason may be because this debt fundamentally depends on the health of the company that issues it, unlike most securitized assets such as auto loans or mortgages.

And while treating a business like an asset-backed security can appeal to investors and restaurant owners in good times, that rigid framework can limit companies’ flexibility in tough times when they need it most, according to some investors familiar with the debt.