Golden Arrow Reports Initial Mineral Resource Estimate for San Pietro Copper-Gold-Iron-Cobalt Project, Chile

In This Article:

TSX Venture Exchange (TSX-V): GRG
Frankfurt Stock Exchange (FSE): G6A
OTCQB Venture Market (OTCQB): GARWF

VANCOUVER, BC, Feb. 28, 2025 /PRNewswire/ - Golden Arrow Resources Corporation (TSXV: GRG) (FSE: G6A) (OTCQB: GARWF), ("Golden Arrow" or the "Company") is pleased to announce the results of the first mineral resource estimate ("MRE") for the San Pietro Copper-Gold-Iron-Cobalt Project in Chile ("San Pietro" or the "Project").

Golden Arrow Resources Corporation logo (CNW Group/Golden Arrow Resources Corporation)
Golden Arrow Resources Corporation logo (CNW Group/Golden Arrow Resources Corporation)

MRE Highlights (see Table 1 for details):

  • 492 million tonnes at an average grade of 0.23% Cu, 0.05 g/t Au, 14.43% Fe & 99 ppm Co in the Inferred category, including  

    • 2.5 Billion pounds of copper, and

    • 770,000 ounces of gold.

The pit-constrained MRE is supported by 32,733 metres of drilling, mostly from the Rincones target which has been the main focus of work to date, but with contributions from the adjacent Colla high cobalt-iron target. (see Figure 1).

Brian McEwen, VP Exploration and Development for Golden Arrow, commented, "We are thrilled to report this initial resource estimate and demonstrate our commitment to building value for our shareholders. In just three years we have turned a US$3.35M property purchase into an asset with substantial copper and gold resources that have the potential to rival other deposits in the region. As designed, our programs to date were successful in expanding and better defining the property's main target, Rincones, resulting in the initial current Inferred mineral resource estimate being announced today. The next phase of drilling will focus on delineating higher grade breccias and mantos within the resource area as measured and indicated resources. We also plan an extensive metallurgical sampling program to gain a better understanding of the recoverable magnetic iron and cobalt recovery options. In addition, we ended our last program on a high note, with long mineralized intervals in large step-out holes at Rincones that support drilling further to the south and east to expand the resource. We are eager to continue our work as we are confident that there is plenty of potential remaining to increase the size and grades of these resources, as well as identify others within our vast property holdings."

Table 1. Estimate of Inferred Mineral Resources Reported using 0.30% CuEq Cutoff



Grade

Contained Metal

CuEq%

Cutoff

Tonnes

Mt

CuEq

%

Cu

%

Au

g/t

Co

ppm

Fe

%

CuEq

Mlb

Cu

Mlb

Au

Oz

Co

Mlb

Fe

Blb

0.30

492

0.41

0.23

0.05

99

14.43

4,444

2,470

770,000

107

157

Notes to Table 1:

1.

In-Situ Mineral resources are reported within a pit shell using metal prices of US$4.80/lb Cu, US$2,300/oz Au, US$15.00/lb Co and US$120.00/lb Fe, mining costs of US$2.50/t, processing and G&A costs of US$9.50/t, 90% recovery for Cu, 65% recovery for Au, 80% recovery for Co and 40% recovery for Fe and an average pit slope of 45 degrees. Additional pitshells were built to demonstrate sensitivity to copper and iron prices using all the same inputs with three different Cu and Fe prices: Cu$3.80/lb and Fe$100/lb, Cu$4.30 and Fe$120/lb, Cu$5.30/lb and Fe$130/lb.

2.

CuEq values are based on copper, gold, cobalt and iron values using metal prices of US$4.10/lb Cu, US$2,500/oz Au, US$15/lb Co and US$105/lb Fe and metallurgical recovery values of 90% for Cu, 65% for Au, 80% for Co and 40% for Fe.  The resulting formula is CuEq=Cu%+(Aug/t *0.705)+(Co%*3.252)+(Fe%*0.008), The cut-off grade for reporting the mineral resources within the pitshell is 0.30% CuEq using total costs of US$18/t.

3.

The block model was classed into Inferred Mineral Resources for blocks with two drillholes within 400 m.

4.

Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources will be converted into Mineral Reserves.

5.

Mineral resources in the Inferred category have a lower level of confidence than that applied to Indicated mineral resources, and, although there is sufficient evidence to imply geologic grade and continuity, these characteristics cannot be verified based on the current data. It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to Indicated mineral resources with continued exploration.

The sensitivity of the in-situ mineral resources to varying copper and iron prices is demonstrated by listing mineral resources contained within pit shells generated at each defined metal price, and at variable cut-off grades. The results are summarized in Table 2.

Waiting for permission
Allow microphone access to enable voice search

Try again.