Unlock stock picks and a broker-level newsfeed that powers Wall Street.

GenSight Biologics Announces Publication of Meta-Analyses Showing Better Outcomes for ND4-LHON Patients Treated with LUMEVOQ®

In This Article:

Figure 1. “A Gradient of Efficacy”: Visual Recovery (CRR from Nadir) Among ND4-LHON Patients (Graphic: Business Wire)
Figure 1. “A Gradient of Efficacy”: Visual Recovery (CRR from Nadir) Among ND4-LHON Patients (Graphic: Business Wire)
  • Patients treated with LUMEVOQ® gene therapy experience better visual outcomes than idebenone-treated patients and untreated patients

  • Most comprehensive analysis of visual outcomes to date among Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON) patients with the ND4 mutation

PARIS, October 28, 2024--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Regulatory News:

GenSight Biologics (Euronext: SIGHT, ISIN: FR0013183985, PEA-PME eligible), a biopharma company focused on developing and commercializing innovative gene therapies for retinal neurodegenerative diseases and central nervous system disorders, today announced the publication of meta-analyses comparing visual outcomes among patients with Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON) caused by a mutation in the MT-ND4 mitochondrial gene (ND4-LHON), the most common mutation leading to the poorest visual prognosis1.

The paper, published in the peer-reviewed journal Survey of Ophthalmology, is the first to compare the efficacy of LHON treatments, approved or in development, on visual outcomes in the ND4-LHON patient population and to compare these outcomes with those in untreated (natural history) patients. The meta-analyses establish a "gradient of efficacy" in two measures of visual outcomes assessed in the paper, with LUMEVOQ® gene therapy having better outcomes compared to idebenone treatment and both treatments having better outcomes compared to the natural history of the disease.

As measured by the rate of Clinically Relevant Recovery (CRR)2, which is the responder rate common across the studies analyzed in the paper, the rate of visual recovery after LUMEVOQ® gene therapy is triple that in the natural evolution of ND4-LHON and substantially greater than that among idebenone-treated patients.

"This study is very important for comparing these therapies’ abilities to achieve visual function outcomes in ND4-LHON patients," commented Dr. Nancy J. Newman, LeoDelle Jolley Professor of Ophthalmology and Neurology at the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, United-States, and lead author. "For the first time, we clearly demonstrate a gradient of efficacy in visual outcomes, more marked for Clinically Relevant Recovery (CRR) than for final Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), with lenadogene nolparvovec gene therapy superior to idebenone treatment, and both superior to the natural history of the disease."

The article updates an earlier set of findings, presented at the 2024 North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society annual meeting, by including data from the recently published LEROS trial for idebenone and by including an assessment of final Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) outcomes among the three groups of patients.