In This Article:
Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) as a tradable security just can’t seem to get it going. Frustratingly, BAC stock has moved sideways for about 18 months now. Shares are at levels not seen since early December 2017.
Source: Shutterstock
All the while, Bank of America stock has consistently looked cheap. Currently, it trades at less than 11x 2019 consensus earnings-per-share estimates. Price-to-book is just 1.1x, near the lowest level seen in the past year, save for the market-driven dip in December.
And I continue to think that the BAC stock price is too cheap, as I’ve argued for some time now, most recently in March. But as external risks mount, particularly after a mixed earnings report for the first quarter of 2019, a rally make take some time to stage.
InvestorPlace - Stock Market News, Stock Advice & Trading Tips
For the most part, BofA is doing what it should, and what it needs to. The problem is that nothing else seems to be cooperating, especially the aforementioned external risks. Given that those threats aren’t going anywhere, the same well might be true for the BAC stock price.
Risks Mount for Bank of America Stock
A core problem for BAC is not just that it’s facing a number of risks, but that they’re seemingly interconnected. That’s been an issue of late, as Bank of America stock has fallen over 9% in just 14 trading sessions.
The obvious culprit for both BofA and the broader markets is rising fear of the trade war. A prolonged battle between the U.S. and China could lead to slower economic growth, which potentially hurts BofA profits.
But it’s not even quite that simple. A trade war in theory could drive higher inflation, not just lower growth. That would lead the Federal Reserve to potentially cut rates. A rate pause already sent BAC stock tumbling back in March. Cuts would be even worse and would reverse the benefits of rising rates that have helped earnings and the Bank of America stock price since the 2016 elections.
Political risk is a factor as well. BAC stock was one of the big winners of that election, gaining some 50% in a matter of months. The thesis then relied partially on a Republican-controlled government rolling back Dodd-Frank and other banking regulations.
That narrative hasn’t quite played out, even though the law was altered last year. But the fear now is that regulation will increase under a potentially Democrat-controlled government. That’s particularly worrisome if trade war difficulties hit the economy and lower President Donald Trump’s re-election prospects.