Establishing Risk Appetite: for Now and for the Future
Dee McCown, Director of Global Security & Loss Prevention at GraingerClick here for high-resolution version · Marketwired

CHICAGO, IL--(Marketwired - April 01, 2016) - Enterprise Risk Management is no longer a division unto itself. ERM programs are now aiming to infiltrate every division within the company so that Risk Management is more than an idea, it's a given throughout the entire enterprise that is practiced as innately as breathing. Establishing risk appetite within the business plan is not only important for now, but also for future success.

Dee McCown, Director of Global Security & Loss Prevention at Grainger, recently spoke with marcus evans about topics to be discussed at the upcoming ERM Evolution 2016 Conference:

Before committing substantial resources, what are some of the areas a company needs to consider with risk-laden investment?

DM: Given my area of expertise is in global security and loss prevention I hone in immediately on the potential risks versus the gains when the business initiates a new investment. One of the first things that needs to be asked by leadership, realistically, is what do we expect to gain (profit) with this investment, and do we understand the risks and corresponding costs to be incurred from managing and mitigating the risk. As an example, if a business is planning an acquisition in Brazil, has the leadership team planned and listed each tangible risk and then assigned a corresponding cost? When businesses fail to prepare in this manner they often end up facing trouble later in the project because they encounter issues that were never considered in pre-operational risk planning. Surprises can mean the difference in success or failure in new high risk investments. Avoiding the failure of identifying risks in advance is critical for managing risk-laden investments.

What advice do you have to offer on staying ahead of the competition by commending and encouraging risk?

DM: My answer might be different than most, but I don't recommend most "average" US companies seek foreign investment and undergo undue risk outside the US when they are unprepared to do so. The most successful companies understand that the long game is the game to play if you want your company to survive in a competitive environment. While it is healthy to promote competition, and encourage business leaders to accept new challenges, I have seen too many well intentioned deals completely fail overseas because a US centric business leadership team had no idea of the risk they would encounter, and once on the ground failed in their original goals. I would submit that understanding the company's limitations, and surviving in "manageable" risk environments, is far better than encouraging and seeking risky business ventures that can't be managed by the team in place. Smart business leaders understand their team's limitations and while it is true that a healthy desire for competition is a key ingredient to successful business cultures it is equally true that understanding the limitations of the team and the corresponding risks they face is equally important for businesses that operate in highly competitive markets.