Are you driving on bad bridges? Kansas is getting $45 million to help locals fix that.

Kansas transportation officials want to help local governments pay for repairs to bridges.

"This is really to address what I consider one of the big issues that will be coming to our state in the coming decades, and that is the backlog of bridges on the local system that will need to be addressed," said Calvin Reed, acting secretary of the Kansas Department of Transportation.

"Just as a reminder, Kansas is fourth in the nation with almost 25,000 bridges, 80% of those bridges are owned by our local partners, and the funding that they have to be able to address their critical bridge needs is obviously competing with other needs in their communities."

Fixing bridges can be expensive. Last summer, the Shawnee County Commission voted to spend nearly $1 million for an "emergency bridge replacement" of a deteriorating 78-year-old bridge.

Bridge inspection data show 58 of the 563 bridges in Shawnee County are in need of repair or corrective action. The U.S. Department of Transportation rates 14 as poor; 16 are structurally deficient.

Statewide, nearly 2,700 of the about 25,000 bridges are in need of repair or corrective action. About 1,300 are rated as poor with about 2,000 structurally deficient.

A Topeka Metro bus drives across S.W. 15th Street bridge over the Shunganunga Creek. Although structurally sound, the bridge was flagged as one of 59 needing repairs because of its width and traffic count. Federal funding will help local governments repair or replace deteriorating bridges.
A Topeka Metro bus drives across S.W. 15th Street bridge over the Shunganunga Creek. Although structurally sound, the bridge was flagged as one of 59 needing repairs because of its width and traffic count. Federal funding will help local governments repair or replace deteriorating bridges.

Through a new federal program in the bipartisan infrastructure law, Kansas has been allocated $45 million a year to address bridges. State officials decided the best way to spend the money is on local bridges.

But local officials won't actually get the federal money, Reed said. Instead, KDOT is doing an internal funds swap, with the state agency using the federal money on state-owned bridges while displacing an equal amount of state funds to go to the local bridge improvement program.

By eliminating the federalism component, "it will be easier for our local partners to administer those state funds," Reed said. There is a matching funds requirement using a sliding scale, where "counties with fewer population have less to match," and the match can account for counties taking deteriorating bridges off the transportation system instead of repairing or replacing them.

KDOT provides update on IKE goals

Reed also told lawmakers that KDOT is on target to meet various funding requirements imposed by the Legislature.

In terms of modernization and expansion projects, nothing is yet under construction in northwest and north-central Kansas, while the northeast region has already surpassed its minimum funding goal with projects currently under construction.

"One of my concerns with having a rolling pipeline is that areas of the state would not be served, so I'm hoping you can alleviate that concern," said Rep. Troy Waymaster, R-Bunker Hill and chair of the Legislative Budget Committee.