ESPN must evolve beyond TV, and still has time to do it

Disney reported a slight earnings and revenue beat Tuesday, on the strength of its recent hit films “Captain America: Civil War” and “Finding Dory.” Earnings came in at $1.62 per share (a cent better than analyst expectations of $1.61) and revenue was $14.278 billion (vs. expectations of $14.15 billion).

The stock fell anyway, down 1.3% after hours. It’s down 11% in the past year, but up a nice 7% in the past six months.

Regardless of Disney’s success in movie theaters, the focus every quarter now is on ESPN, which has been something of a dark cloud over Cinderella Castle for just over a year.

This time around, ESPN did well. The network is part of Disney’s cable networks division and accounts for more than half of the division’s revenue, and that revenue was up 1% in the third quarter to $4.2 billion. The division’s operating income also rose 1% to $2.1 billion. Disney pointed specifically to ESPN as the source, adding that other parts of the cable networks division, not ESPN, held the division back from even better growth.

“The increase in operating income was due to growth at ESPN, partially offset by a decrease at the Disney Channels, lower equity income from A&E and lower Freeform results,” it said in a press release. “The increase at ESPN was due to affiliate and advertising revenue growth, partially offset by higher programming costs. Affiliate revenue growth was due to contractual rate increases, partially offset by a decline in subscribers and an unfavorable impact from foreign currency translation.”

The key phrase there is “decline in subscribers.” ESPN’s growth this quarter was thanks to ad rate increases that were built in to its contracts—contracts that are set to end soon. (Cablevision renews in 2017, Time Warner in 2019.) It masks the fact that subscribers dipped yet again—and that is what many will latch onto to spur the narrative that ESPN is in a death spiral.

It’s a misleading narrative.

Yes, ESPN is slowly hemorrhaging subscribers. According to August estimates from Nielsen, the network was in 90.98 million homes in February, and is now in 88.78 million. Yes, cord-cutters and so-called “cord-nevers” (people who never had a cable subscription to begin with) are hurting premium networks like ESPN. But ESPN isn’t vanishing from the airwaves any time soon, and more importantly, it is ramping up its efforts in areas other than traditional television.

There is another false sub-narrative that ESPN’s subscriber decline is because the network has shifted to the left politically, as evidenced by ESPN and ABC broadcasting a “race relations town hall” with President Obama last month, and by ESPN firing analyst Curt Schilling over social media posts. But the decline isn’t about politics. ESPN isn’t losing subscribers because of anything it’s done wrong or failed to do right, it is losing subscribers because of the overall decreasing appetite for sports content on television. Its closest competitor, Fox Sports 1 (FS1), part of the same company that houses conservative-leaning Fox News Channel, is being hit just as hard by the shift: FS1 dropped from 84.16 million households in February to 82.70 million this month, according to Nielsen. And FS1 only just launched in 2013.