DARZALEX FASPRO® (daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj)-based regimens demonstrate improved rates of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity and progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

In This Article:

New analysis from Phase 3 CEPHEUS study demonstrates 85 percent of patients who achieved MRD negativity (10-6) with DARZALEX FASPRO® were progression free at 4.5 years

Subgroup analysis from Phase 3 AURIGA study show higher rates of MRD-negative conversion in patient populations disproportionately impacted by multiple myeloma

SAN DIEGO, Dec. 8, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) today announced data highlighting that DARZALEX FASPRO® (daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj)-based regimens improve overall and sustained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rates and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), regardless of transplant status.1,2 These findings were demonstrated in an expanded MRD analysis of the Phase 3 CEPHEUS study (Abstract #362) and a post hoc analysis of clinically relevant subgroups in the Phase 3 AURIGA study (Abstract #675), which were both featured as oral presentations at the 2024 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting.

(PRNewsfoto/Johnson & Johnson)
(PRNewsfoto/Johnson & Johnson)

Data from the expanded MRD analysis of the Phase 3 CEPHEUS study show the addition of DARZALEX FASPRO® to bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-VRd) leads to improved and deepened rates of overall and sustained MRD negativity (both 10-5 and 10-6 sensitivity thresholds in patients who achieved a complete response or better) versus VRd alone, and shows significantly improved progression-free survival.1 CEPHEUS is the fifth Phase 3 study showing the addition of DARZALEX® improves depth and duration of response, leading to improved progression-free survival.1,3,4,5

At a median follow-up of 58.7 months, overall MRD-negativity rates were significantly higher with D-VRd versus VRd at both 10–5 (60.9 percent vs. 39.4 percent; odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 1.58-3.55; P<0.0001) and 10–6 (46.2 percent vs. 27.3 percent; OR, 2.24; 95 percent CI, 1.48-3.40; P=0.0001) sensitivity thresholds. Treatment with D-VRd shows continued benefit of sustained MRD negativity for two years (10-5: 42.1 percent vs. 22.7 percent; 10-6: 27.9 percent vs. 13.6 percent). Additionally, the deeper and more sustained MRD negativity rates with D-VRd trended with improved progression-free survival (PFS) rates – the estimated 54-month PFS rates were 86.2 percent for D-VRd patients versus 79 percent for VRd in MRD negative (10-6) patients, and 51 percent versus 36.5 percent for MRD-positive patients.1

"This analysis from the CEPHEUS study comparing daratumumab-VRd versus VRd, showed higher rates of both overall and sustained MRD negativity alongside promising trends in progression-free survival," said Sonja Zweegman, MD, PhD, head of the Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center.* "This regimen has the potential to improve outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are ineligible for transplant or for whom transplant is not planned as initial therapy."