Commander Resources Board Reminds Shareholders Not to Tender Shares to FruchtExpress' Unsolicited Take-Over Bid and Provides Corporate Updates

In This Article:

  • Commander's Board of Directors and Special Committee recommends that Shareholders REJECT the Hostile Bid and NOT TENDER their Commander shares - SIMPLY TAKE NO ACTION

  • Commander Regains 100% interest in Burn Porphyry Copper Property, British Columbia and provides updates on its current exploration work.

  • Questions about the Hostile bid? Contact Commander's strategic advisor and information agent, Laurel Hill Advisory Group at 1-877-452-7184 or by email at assistance@laurelhill.com

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - August 29, 2024) - The Board of Directors (the "Board") of Commander Resources Ltd. (TSXV: CMD) ("Commander" or the "Company") reminds shareholders that the Board recommends Commander shareholders reject the unsolicited take-over bid for all the issued and outstanding shares of Commander for $0.09 per share (the "Hostile Bid") from FruchtExpress Grabher GmbH & Co KG ("FEx").

Shareholders simply need to take no action in order to REJECT the Hostile Bid.

The Board's recommendation was made after receiving the recommendation of the Special Committee (the "Special Committee") and advice from its legal and financial advisors.

The Special Committee and Board of Directors continue to believe that the Hostile Bid is below the price that reasonable Commander Shareholders should accept for their shares, because the Hostile Bid does not adequately value not just the Company's cash on hand, but also does not attribute any value to Commander's properties, and prospects, as more particularly described in the Directors' Circular (defined below). The Board made it clear to FEx before the formalization of the bid that they did not view it as adequate and is disappointed by the continued drain on both management's time and the treasury that has resulted.

Reasons to Reject FEx' Offer

The reasons for rejecting the Hostile Bid are set out in detail in the directors' circular dated June 6, 2024 (the "Directors' Circular"), which has been filed on SEDAR+ (www.sedarplus.ca). The reasons to reject the Hostile Bid include:

  1. The Hostile Bid is self-serving and predatory

    • The Hostile Bid is disadvantageous to Commander Shareholders and is a predatory offer by an insider shareholder. The cost of acquiring Commander shares not already owned by FEx under the Hostile Bid would be near the current Company cash balance, after accounting for the recently completed non-core royalty portfolio sale and ongoing exploration activities. If the Hostile Bid was successful, FEx would effectively be acquiring the Company for free while attributing no or negative value to the principal properties and business of the Company.

  2. The Hostile Bid significantly undervalues the Company

    • Not only is the Hostile Bid lower than cash value of the Company after accounting for the non-core royalty portfolio sale completed in June 2024, but the Hostile Bid fails to take into account any value for the principal properties and business of the Company which include the Burn, October Dome, Henry Lee, and Tam Misty properties in British Columbia, the Sabin and First Loon properties in Ontario, the Flume property in the Yukon, and the Nepisiquit property in New Brunswick, as well as two joint ventures (the Pedro project in Mexico with Southern Empire Resources Corp., and the SVB project in Labrador with Fjordland Exploration Inc). Please refer to the Directors' Circular for further details of these properties, joint ventures, and royalties.

  3. The Hostile Bid eliminates all future upside exposure for shareholders

    • The Hostile Bid will eliminate the potential for any future increase in value of Commander's properties or prospects accruing to the Commander Shareholders because they will cease to hold Commander shares, and any such potential future increase in value will be owned solely by FEx, particularly in light of the recent receipt of material non-dilutive funding from the sale of the non-core royalty portfolio for US$4.1M in cash, proceeds from which the Company is using to fund exploration programs to advance top priority projects and to progress the next tier of 100% owned exploration projects as well as for identification of opportunities to grow the Company's exposure to premium exploration projects, primarily in the copper-gold space.

    • Commander's Board and management plan to deploy the cash on hand into exploration opportunities at a time where the market for copper and gold appears to be gaining momentum and will reward such activity. Any opportunity to surface shareholder value under this plan will be lost if FEx takes the Company private and gains control over Commander's funds for its own benefit. The Hostile Bid is insufficient to make up for that lost opportunity.

  4. Commander has a strong balance sheet and no near-term dilution risk for shareholders

    • With approximately C$4.0M in cash on the balance sheet, Commander is in an enviable position, particularly amongst its junior exploration peer group. The Company is well setup to pursue value maximizing opportunities for shareholders, with no risk of near-term dilution. FEx is essentially attempting to use the Company's (and by extension its shareholders') own financial position to acquire the Company for free.

  5. The Hostile Bid is financially inadequate

    • The Commander Board and Special Committee has received a written opinion from the independent Financial Advisor, that as of June 4, 2024 and based on and subject to the assumptions, limitations and qualifications set forth therein and other such matters that the Financial Advisor considered relevant, the Financial Advisor was of the opinion that the cash consideration to be received by the Commander Shareholders (other than FEx and its affiliates) under the Hostile Bid is financially inadequate to Commander Shareholders.

  6. Commander Board and management are actively pursuing potential strategic alternatives

    • Commander's management and the Commander Board are evaluating a range of strategic alternatives, any of which might be more favorable to Commander Shareholders when compared with the Hostile Bid.