CNBC Transcript: Robert Shiller, Professor, Yale University and Nobel Laureate

Following is the transcript of a CNBC interview with Robert Shiller, Yale University Professor and 2013 Nobel Laureate, at the China Development Forum in Beijing. The interview was broadcast on CNBC's Squawk Box on 26 March 2018. All references must be sourced to a "CNBC Interview'.

Interviewed by CNBC's Martin Soong.

Martin Soong (MS): So professor here we go. You've been quoted widely saying that the president is showing and displaying spirit. Right. It's great that he cares about the American worker, but the way he's going about doing it now with these tariffs on steel, on aluminum and now on China - might not be the best way to do it.

Robert Shiller: Well he has hired some extremist people. For example, Peter Navarro wrote a book with, can you believe this, with the title is 'Death by China', and then he calls the Chinese 'assassins' of our business. Pretty strong language. It seemed to me that no responsible president would give credence to that, but here we are. I think he's a showman who is doing this for political reasons within the U.S.

MS: So you think it's about the midterms then?

Robert Shiller: Well it's that and also his re-election in three years. And also when he gets a constitutional amendment so he can have any number of terms.

MS: OK I know you're joking of course right although people are semi-worried about that prospect. Talk to us about the prospect of going on tariff route backfiring on him – simply because you know if you're looking to create, let's say steel jobs – I mean those kinds of jobs are just not really coming back.

Robert Shiller: Right. That has been the Enlightenment for a couple of centuries now. Steel industry is particularly automated and mechanized so it just doesn't seem to be the way the way one would defend jobs. But you know I think he's explained, displaying something you call a foolish consistency, he's advocated this kind of thing before and he wants to show that he's true to his word.

MS: Goodness. OK, let's talk about the risks or possibilities with regards to U.S.-China. So far the response on China's part to the 232 steel and aluminum imports has been pretty modest, about three billion dollars' worth right? If and when it does escalate, they start targeting let's say soybeans, sorghum, Boeing, car. What happens then? Because when you take a look at the balance right, the stuff that China ships over to the U.S., and that the U.S. imports is mostly finished goods. And it's in large part sort of finished consumer goods as well. And consumption being two thirds to three quarters of the U.S. economy, how much flexibility does the U.S. have to look for alternative sourcing, to pivot in other words?