In This Article:
NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / August 8, 2019 / Levi & Korsinsky, LLP announces that class action lawsuits have commenced on behalf of shareholders of the following publicly-traded companies. To determine your eligibility and get free access to our shareholder support tools that provide you with case updates, automated loss calculations and claims recovery assistance, please contact the firm via the links below. There will be no cost or obligation to you.
Sunlands Technology Group (STG)
Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased shareholders of Sunlands Technology Group who purchased shares pursuant and/or traceable to Sunlands’ March 2018 initial public stock offering.
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : August 26, 2019
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/sunlands-technology-group-loss-form?prid=2848&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, (1) Sunlands’ student enrollment was declining; (2) Sunlands’ gross billings were declining; (3) Sunlands' marketing tactics were not as robust as described in the Registration Statement; and (4) as a result, Defendants’ statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
L Brands, Inc. (LB)
Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased May 31, 2018 - November 19, 2018
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : September 23, 2019
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/l-brands-inc-loss-form?prid=2848&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, during the class period, L Brands, Inc. made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (a) the Victoria’s Secret and PINK businesses were having a material adverse effect on the Company’s cash flow, liquidity and debt levels; (b) Defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements about the ability of the Company to sustain its dividend; (c) the MD&A disclosures in filings L Brands made with the SEC were materially false and misleading; (d) the risk factor disclosures in filings L Brands made with the SEC were materially false and misleading; (e) the representations about L Brands’ disclosure controls in filings the Company made with the SEC were materially false and misleading; (f) the certifications issued by Defendants Wexner and Burgdoerfer on L Brands disclosure controls were materially false and misleading; and (g) based on the foregoing, Defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements about L Brands’ then-current business operations and future financial
prospects.