In This Article:
NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / December 2, 2019 / Levi & Korsinsky, LLP announces that class action lawsuits have commenced on behalf of shareholders of the following publicly-traded companies. To determine your eligibility and get free access to our shareholder support tools that provide you with case updates, automated loss calculations and claims recovery assistance, please contact the firm via the links below. There will be no cost or obligation to you.
The RealReal, Inc. (NASDAQ:REAL)
REAL Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased all persons and entities who purchased RealReal common stock pursuant and/or traceable to the Company's registration statement issued in connection with the Company's June 27, 2019 initial public offering.
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : January 24, 2020
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/the-realreal-inc-loss-form?prid=4692&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, (1) the Company's employees received little training on how to spot fake items; (2) the Company's strict quotas on its employees exacerbated product authentication issues; (3) consequently, the potential for counterfeit or mislabeled items to make it through Company's authentication process was higher than disclosed; and (4) as a result, Defendants' statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.
Pareteum Corporation (TEUM)
TEUM Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased December 14, 2017 - October 21, 2019
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : December 23, 2019
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/pareteum-corporation-loss-form?prid=4692&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, during the class period, Pareteum Corporation made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (a) it was not true that the Company's purported success was the result of hyper-demand for Pareteum's unique products or exceptional service, or the Company's competent management; but, in fact, Defendants had propped up the Company's results by manipulating Pareteum's accounting for revenues, income, and the important Backlog metric; (b) Defendants had materially overstated the Company's profitability by failing to properly account for the Company's results of operations and by artificially inflating the Company's financial results; (c) it was not true that Pareteum contained even the most minimally adequate systems of internal operational or financial controls necessary to assure that Pareteum's reported financial statements were true, accurate, and/or reliable; (d) as a result, it also was not true that the Company's financial statements and reports were prepared in accordance with GAAP and SEC rules; and (e) as a result of the aforementioned adverse conditions, Defendants lacked any reasonable basis to claim that Pareteum was operating according to plan, or that Pareteum could achieve the guidance sponsored and/or endorsed by Defendants.