DALLAS—Amid pressure to grow production to meet today’s oil and gas needs while focusing on emissions reduction targets and addressing ESG concerns, traditional oil companies like Chevron Corp. aim to find balance.

This comes as many companies move toward different business models, responding to evolving investor expectations and need to address climate change. For Lisa Epifani, manager of ESG and sustainability for Chevron Corp., companies can either replace oil molecules with electrons, shrink their footprints or remove carbon from the air.

“Some companies are choosing to shrink their business by replacing the oil molecule with electrons. That’s not what Chevron is pursuing,” she told a roomful of people gathered for Hart Energy’s Energy ESG Conference on April 27. “We believe that our assets, our capabilities and our partnerships are best focused on trying to reach reductions in the hard to abate sectors. So, we’re very focused on that reduce and remove part of the formula.”

Chevron, which is targeting net-zero Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 2050, has allocated $10 billion toward advancing its low-carbon future. Of that, $8 billion is allocated for low-carbon investments and $2 billion toward carbon-reduction projects by 2028. Its low-carbon business projects are focused on renewable fuels, hydrogen, offsets and carbon capture.

“We’ve set a target of 25 million tonnes a year of CCUS storage by 2030, and this is a very ambitious target. If you think about the fact that Chevron today operates one of the largest CCS facilities in the world at Gorgon in Australia, that puts about 4 million tonnes a year away,” Epifani said. “We’re trying to build four to five Gorgon-sized CCS over the next 10 years. It’s not going to be a giant one-sized facility, but a lot of storage hubs and networks and partnerships. It’s going to take a lot of work. So, collaboration will be key.”

Energy companies are evolving as the world moves further into the energy transition seeking low-carbon energy sources to minimize the impacts of climate change. The transition, however, must be orderly, Epifani said. Reality should not be overlooked.

She recalled a challenging conversation with some investors who she said wanted Chevron to use the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) net-zero scenario as the company’s business plan.

“We use it as a stress test and offer scenario analysis … but it’s not the basis of our business planning,” Epifani said, calling the IEA’s assumptions lofty. “We don’t see them unfolding today. The world governments are not moving fast enough to put carbon prices in place. Governments are not offering the technology innovation, subsidies and support and so on. So, it’s very important for people, again, to be realistic about the ambition versus the reality.”