Unlock stock picks and a broker-level newsfeed that powers Wall Street.
CEO Daily: Thursday, April 21

How would Donald Trump lead the nation? At Fortune, we decided to try and answer that question by looking at how he ran his business. Our piece, by Shawn Tully and Roger Parloff, is running in the May issue of the magazine. You can read it today, here.

 

Separately, I've been critical of the current crop of political candidates, including both Trump and Clinton, for not offering a pro-growth agenda. But what would such an agenda look like? Today, we also are releasing an essay from two erstwhile presidential hopefuls - former Republican Governor Jon Huntsman and former Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman - that offers one answer. The organization they chair, called No Labels, has put together a list of 60 proposals for consideration by the next president that you can read here.

The No Labels proposals will leave Washington lobbyists howling. The tax reform plan, for instance, would eliminate the lower tax rate on capital gains loved by the investor class, and the proposal to let the federal government negotiate drug prices will be attacked by pharmaceutical companies as price controls. Their proposals to cut income and corporate tax rates and sunset regulations will anger those who wrongly think throttling business and redistributing income is the key to combatting inequality. In short, the proposals violate the dogma of the left and the right.

 

But that's what makes them worth studying. These proposals weren't designed to satisfy partisan ideologues or special interests; they were designed to promote growth and raise American living standards. Each has been shown in polls to have the support of a majority of Americans. Whoever wins in November should pay some heed. The partisan strategy for governing has clearly failed. This is a roadmap to a more bipartisan approach.

 

Let me know your reaction.

 

See original article on Fortune.com

More from Fortune.com

Top News

[bs_bullet_primary]

Deadline Day for Volkswagen

Volkswagen is expected to admit that it hasn't been able to fix up to 500,000 cars with 2-liter engines to make them conform to U.S. environmental regulation, and will therefore offer to buy them back. German media reports are mooting that drivers will also get up to $5,000 in cash compensation through a specially set up fund. This isn't the end of the scandal, although it does provide some clarity regarding a major element of it: how to appease U.S. customers and dealers. But the company still faces lawsuits and criminal investigations in a number of countries, and its credibility took a hit earlier this week when it emerged that the idea of installing 'defeat devices' to fool U.S. regulators went back a lot further than it previously claimed, and originated not in a close circle of conspirators at its Wolfsburg HQ, but at its upmarket Audi brand, based hundreds of miles away. The company's shares have risen 5% in Frankfurt this morning to a new high for 2016, underlining how much markets love the removal of uncertainty. [bs_link link="http://fortune.com/2016/04/20/this-is-volkswagens-big-fix-for-its-dirty-diesel-scandal/" source="Fortune"]