Unlock stock picks and a broker-level newsfeed that powers Wall Street.
Car Brands with the Worst Appeal

What makes a car appealing to buyers? According to a recent J.D. Power report, consumers know what matters and vote with their wallets. A more appealing car commands a higher price, sells more quickly and develops customers who are loyal to the brand. Cars with low score tend to do worse in these areas.

The researchers at J.D. Power point to five broad categories: design, performance, comfort, features and style. These measures add up to a car’s score on the J.D. Power 2013 Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout (APEAL) study. 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the 10 car brands that received the lowest APEAL scores. Smart had the worst overall score, while Mitsubishi and Subaru also ranked poorly.

The Best States to Be Unemployed

Click here to see the 10 car brands

As might be expected, vehicles that receive a higher APEAL score generally can demand a higher price. Customers pay an average of more than $50,000 for BMW, Audi or Porsche, the top three brands for APEAL. Most of the 10 car brands with the worst appeal have lower average transaction prices, including Scion, FIAT and smart, which are the fourth-lowest, third-lowest and lowest-priced cars, on average.

Ten Brands That Will Disappear in 2014

Many of the car brands with lower APEAL are struggling in the U.S. auto market. Nationally, sales are up by 7.5% this year, compared to the same period in 2012. Of the 10 brands with the lowest APEAL scores, eight grew at a slower rate or had declining sales. Sales of smart are down by 6.1%.

Some of the cars that should expect new buyers because of redesigns actually fall short. J.D. Power noted that the Range Rover, the Buick Encore and the Porsche Boxer performed much better than their segment averages following a redesign. On the other hand, the Acura ILX, Scion FR-S, Acura RDX, Subaru XV Crosstrek and Subaru BRZ did worse than their segment averages following a redesign.

The 2013 J.D. Power APEAL Study is “based on responses gathered between February and May 2013 from more than 83,000 purchasers and lessees of new 2013 model year cars and light trucks, who were surveyed after the first 90 days of ownership. The APEAL Study complements the Initial Quality Study (IQS), which focuses on problems experienced by owners during the first 90 days of ownership.” For this piece, 24/7 Wall St. also reviewed other J.D. Power surveys of brand quality. We also considered sales and average transaction price through June, 2013, provided by Kelley Blue Book.

States Sending the Most People to Prison

These are the car brands with the worst appeal.

10. GMC
> APEAL score: 784 (tied-9th lowest)
> YTD sales change: +9.8%
> Manufacturer: General Motors Co. (GM)
> Average price (June 2013): $39,942