Unlock stock picks and a broker-level newsfeed that powers Wall Street.
Cannabix (BLOZF) Adds Nationally Renowned Expert Dr. Marilyn Huestis to Advisory Board

SEATTLE, WA / ACCESSWIRE / April 21, 2016 / Cannabix Technologies Inc. (BLOZF)(CSE:BLO), developer of the Cannabix Marijuana Breathalyzer for law enforcement and the workplace, recently announced the appointment of Dr. Marilyn Huestis to its Scientific Advisory Board. As a leading expert on human drug testing, and more specifically, the effects of marijuana use on driving, she advises many different organizations, including the Transportation Research Board Committee on Alcohol and Other Drugs and the National Safety Council's Alcohol, Drugs, and Impairment Division.

Dr. Huestis, who on February 5th retired from her 23 year career as the Senior Investigator and Chief of Chemistry and Drug Metabolism at the National Institute on Drug Abuse, will assist the company in developing the Cannabix Marijuana Breathalyzer as a tool for law enforcement to determine if a driver is impaired. The durable, portable hand-held tool leverages FAIMS-MS technology to quickly and accurately measure THC levels in breath.

State Laws Remain Inconsistent

There are many different state laws addressing driver impairment, but these rules vary greatly between states, even from a medical point of view. Of the four states where recreational marijuana has been legalized, two have no laws on the books at all to address marijuana impairment, while Colorado and Washington only permit 5ng/mL of THC per se. Some medical marijuana states, like Nevada, have implemented similar rules or zero-tolerance rules, while some states that have no marijuana programs even have set tolerance levels.

The idea of having limits for THC seems logical. After all, everyone knows that a 0.08 blood alcohol levels is a limit for drinking and driving. The problem is that THC levels cannot be measured in the same way, which means many law enforcement agencies rely on intrusive blood testing combined with roadside tests to enforce the rules. When push comes to shove, these are difficult measures to enforce on the streets compared to breathalyzer testing.

In the below interview Dr. Huestis goes in detail about the testing done to determine comparable impairment levels:

Defining What Constitutes Impairment

Dr. Huestis and her team were seeking to discover the comparable intoxication levels of someone who had a .08 BAL with the ng level of THC in their system through a series of tests. These tests were conducted in a driving simulator after calibrating each individual drivers eyes and reaction times. After completing the tests, Dr. Huestis was able to create a model where they showed the concentration of THC that was equivalent to a .08 BAL was 13.1ng/mL.