Bullwhip effect cracking US imports’ peak season (again)
The vessel ONE MISSION berthed at the Port of Houston. (Photo: Jim Allen/FreightWaves)
The vessel ONE MISSION berthed at the Port of Houston. (Photo: Jim Allen/FreightWaves)

Last week, we forecast a further decline in U.S. containerized import volumes in the second half of 2023, and a “new” bottom for volumes during this downcycle. The lingering effects of the “bullwhip effect” on inventories, along with the considerable downside risks that exist to consumer spending, the upcoming months are likely to witness an unprecedented level of caution among importers during this year’s peak season. This caution, combined with a weakening global macroeconomic backdrop, only heightens the risks of declining import volumes.

The Inbound Ocean TEUs Volume Index – USA with four-year seasonality. Chart: FreightWaves SONAR. To learn more about FreightWaves SONAR, <a href="https://sonar.freightwaves.com/sonar-demo-request?utm_source=FreightWaves&utm_medium=Editorial&utm_campaign=SONAR" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" data-ylk="slk:click here;elm:context_link;itc:0;sec:content-canvas" class="link ">click here</a>.
The Inbound Ocean TEUs Volume Index – USA with four-year seasonality. Chart: FreightWaves SONAR. To learn more about FreightWaves SONAR, click here.

As we forecast, ocean container bookings in the first half of 2023 (white line) have continued trending right alongside 2019 levels (orange line). This is expected to continue through early Q3,  at which point we will likely begin to see a detaching from 2019 levels to find a “new” bottom, ultimately resulting in a significant drop of 10% to 20% below levels experienced during the 2nd-half of 2019. Below is a chart of what that decline of 10% (orange) to 20% (red) in monthly loaded import TEUs would look like across the Top 10 U.S. ports.

To learn more about FreightWaves SONAR, <a href="https://sonar.freightwaves.com/sonar-demo-request?utm_source=FreightWaves&utm_medium=Editorial&utm_campaign=SONAR" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" data-ylk="slk:click here;elm:context_link;itc:0;sec:content-canvas" class="link ">click here</a>.
To learn more about FreightWaves SONAR, click here.

The most recent May report from Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) data highlights an important nuance in the persistently high inventories. While the supply chain activity reached an all-time low for the third consecutive month in May, inventory levels also contracted for the first time since the early days of the pandemic. However, even though inventory levels decreased by 1.5 points to 49.5 (marking the first time since February 2020 that inventories have entered contraction territory), it’s important to note that downstream retail inventories continue to grow at a rate of 54.4, while upstream manufacturer and wholesaler inventories are contracting at a rate of 46.7, which pulled down the overall figure for May.

Logistics Manager Index – LMI composite measure vs. LMI inventory levels in white and green, respectively. To learn more about FreightWaves SONAR, <a href="https://sonar.freightwaves.com/sonar-demo-request?utm_source=FreightWaves&utm_medium=Editorial&utm_campaign=SONAR" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" data-ylk="slk:click here;elm:context_link;itc:0;sec:content-canvas" class="link ">click here</a>.
Logistics Manager Index – LMI composite measure vs. LMI inventory levels in white and green, respectively. To learn more about FreightWaves SONAR, click here.

With retail inventories still in a period of expansion, retailers that are major U.S. importers can be expected to adopt a cautious approach as they navigate the excess inventories that have accumulated in the supply chain bullwhip. These retailers have been scaling back since recognizing the inventory issue in Q1 2022, but the reality is that high inventory levels persist and could extend the destocking cycle throughout (at least) the remainder of 2023. This will require importers to be increasingly strategic in their reordering efforts in the second half to prevent further inventory buildup and manage costs effectively while addressing any additional shifts in consumer demand.

As a prime example, Target, one of the major retail players (and the second-largest U.S. importer of containerized goods) entered 2023 with a sense of caution due to its inventory glut and potential shifts in consumer spending patterns. The company’s fiscal year 2022 report highlighted the challenges posed by rapid changes in consumer preferences and supply chain volatility, necessitating careful inventory planning to minimize markdowns. In the most recent quarter, Target has now seen both a decline in foot traffic (down 9% y/y) and sales figures (down 5% y/y) as reported by CitiBank analysts, which has likely only increased Target’s concerns about reordering/restocking. In the report from CitiBank, which downgraded Target’s stock price, the Citi analysts also noted other growing concerns for the retailer, such as the competitive pressure posed by Walmart, which is expected to continue gaining market share (largely due to its strong Grocery segment), potentially impacting Target’s discretionary sales, which account for 55% of its overall sales. With Target serving as a prime example of the issues that major retailers are potentially facing heading into the second half of 2023, it is becoming increasingly evident why the company would be incredibly cautious with bringing in new container volumes.