Business
In This Article:
The original blockchain trilemma claimed that blockchain users were always going to have to choose between decentralization, scalability, and security. At best, they could have two out of three. The new trilemma is about products, customers, and regulatory approval. Again, pick any two.
When it came to the technology trilemma, at least in the case of Ethereum, the network was long seen as having strong decentralization and robust security, but seriously constrained when it came to capacity. Today, while the trade-offs between these different priorities have never gone away, blockchains themselves have advanced so enormously that in all three areas, most users consider them to be “good enough.”
For many, Ethereum’s transition from Proof of Work (PoW) to Proof of Stake (PoS) and launch of layer 2 networks, is seen as a transition point from a time when trade-offs between these options had big impacts. Ethereum continues to offer solid security and decentralization as a base layer, but the many layer 2 networks available, also offer massive scalability.
The shift into this new trilemma was triggered earlier this year by the nearly simultaneous approval of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs in the U.S. and the start of the Markets in Crypto Assets regulation (MiCA) which came into effect in Europe. Between these two landmark events and a host of other countries implementing regulatory regimes for digital assets, a fundamental shift is underway in the market.
For many of the biggest companies in the world of digital assets, they possess products and customers, but lack regulatory approval. More than 70% of crypto assets and trading is done offshore, and many of the crypto-native firms cut back their efforts to get licensed in big markets during the recent downturn. As a result, these firms have an existing customer base and quite a few digital asset offerings but lack regulatory approvals to move their businesses onshore and chase new revenues.
A second set group of firms we see a lot of, are digital-asset natives in regulated markets. They have products and regulatory approvals but no customers. These firms have focused on creating digital assets in a regulated environment. They were ahead of their traditional financial peers and have had approvals for their products, but no legacy customer base with whom to sell them.
Finally, you have the biggest and most mature financial institutions. Banks have enormous customer bases and mature regulatory compliance processes, but usually no digital assets to offer.
Like the technical trilemma, there is no perfect solution for matching the entities and creating the perfect union that offers complete regulatory approval, an enormous range of products and a giant customer base. There are several obstacles that stand in the way of that outcome.