2017 is proving a scandal-ridden year for Uber, with workplace sexual harassment allegations and the departure of CEO Travis Kalanick. But there’s one scandal likely to hound the ride-sharing startup for months to come: a legal battle with Waymo, the self-driving car company spun-out from Google (GOOG, GOOGL).

The case pits Uber’s self-driving car technology against Waymo’s. According to the lawsuit, former Google engineer Anthony Levandowski downloaded nearly 14,000 confidential files in late 2015 related to Google’s self-driving car technology before leaving the company to co-found Otto, a startup that developed self-driving technology for truck rigs. Uber then acquired Otto for a reported $680 million in August 2016.

Waymo claims the documents Levandowski downloaded were used to help develop Uber’s own self-driving car technology and misappropriates its trade secrets, particularly those related to Google’s distance-measuring LiDAR technology.

Carl Tobias, a professor at the University of Richmond School of Law, argued the way Waymo has already conducted its litigation suggests there may potentially be sufficient evidence to corroborate Waymo’s claims. If true, Waymo has little reason to settle.

“I just think Waymo is going to turn down the screws,” Tobias said. “They’re not going to settle reasonably or comfortably or for some small amount, if at all.”

While the lawsuit is scheduled to go to trial some time in October, litigation around the case is evolving. This May, a federal judge in California judge referred the case to the US Attorney’s Office for an investigation into possible trade secrets theft. On a conference call last week, Uber told investors it was engaged in court-mandated settlement talks with Waymo’s parent company, Alphabet Inc. Following one of those settlement meetings, Waymo agreed to drop three out of four of its patent claims.

Why it’s in Uber’s best interest to settle

It’s unclear whether Uber and Waymo will reach a settlement agreement before both parties go to trial, but Tobias contended it’s in Uber’s best interest to settle.

“They don’t need the trouble of this litigation,” Tobias said. “There’s too much going on at Uber right now to focus on this as an ‘add-on.’”

Tobias has a point. This year alone, Uber saw an employee exodus, including the resignation of CEO Travis Kalanick following months of controversy around alleged sexual harassment at the company. Without a chief executive, and with Uber attempting to improve its standing externally and internally, Uber doesn’t need the added headache — and bad publicity — involved with a lengthy trial, which it could very well lose.