In This Article:
It wasn't all that long ago that both Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) and Oracle (NYSE: ORCL) would have both been considered no-brainer investments in the tech market. While both companies have made stumbles transitioning their businesses to ride the next tech wave, only Microsoft has successfully stayed atop its board and surfed toward renewed success.
Microsoft's jump from a software-based company to cloud computing services has helped push the tech stalwart's stock price up about 150% over the past three years. Meanwhile, Oracle's slow move away from its legacy software business hasn't been as impressive, and investors have taken notice. Oracle's shares have failed to beat the S&P 500 benchmark during the past three years.
But to really understand how these companies are doing, we need to take a closer look at their financials, what advantages they may have over their competitors, and how their valuations stack up against each other.
Image source: Getty Images.
Financial fortitude
Company | Cash | Debt | Free Cash Flow (TTM) |
---|---|---|---|
Microsoft | $131.5 billion | $86.3 billion | $33.6 billion |
Oracle | $40.0 billion | $56.4 billion | $13.1 billion |
Data sources: Yahoo Finance! and Morningstar. TTM = trailing 12 months.
There really isn't much of a contest here between the two companies. Microsoft generates much more cash and has substantially more free cash flow than Oracle. This gives Microsoft more flexibility to adapt to economic downturns or snatch up smaller businesses to help spur new growth.
While Microsoft does have more debt than Oracle, its available cash more than offsets its liabilities.
Winner: Microsoft.
Valuation
Company | P/E Ratio (TTM) | Forward P/E | EV/EBITDA |
---|---|---|---|
Microsoft | 28.4 | 25.0 | 18.4 |
Oracle | 19.7 | 14.6 | 12.5 |
Data source: Yahoo! Finance. TTM = trailing 12 months.
The average price-to-earnings ratio for companies in the S&P 500 is about 25, which makes Oracle's shares relatively cheap compared with Microsoft's. But Microsoft's stock isn't all that expensive based on these metrics, either.
Meanwhile, the average EV/EBITDA for companies in the S&P 500 is about 17, which again makes Oracle's stock cheaper when compared with Microsoft's. So based on these metrics, Oracle gets the win on valuation.
Winner: Oracle.
Competitive advantage
There was a time when Oracle had a sustainable competitive advantage over its competitors. It could offer some of the best hardware on the market and get enough customers to use its products so that it became too expensive for them to switch to its competitors.