Belinvestbank -- Moody's places the ratings of three Belarus banks on review for downgrade

Rating Action: Moody's places the ratings of three Belarus banks on review for downgrade

Global Credit Research - 01 Sep 2020

London, 01 September 2020 -- Moody's Investors Service, ("Moody's") today placed all long-term ratings and assessments of Belarusbank, Belagroprombank JSC (Belagroprombank) and Belinvestbank on review for downgrade. The outlooks on the long-term deposit ratings, as well as the issuer outlooks, were changed to review down from stable. Concurrently, Moody's affirmed two banks' short-term Counterparty Risk (CR) Assessments of Not Prime(cr) and short-term Counterparty Risk Ratings (CRRs) of Not Prime (NP), as well as three banks' short-term deposit ratings of Not Prime (NP).

For a detailed list of ratings affected, please refer to the end of this Press Release.

RATINGS RATIONALE

THE REVIEW FOR DOWNGRADE REFLECTS POTENTIAL FOR POLITICAL INSTABILITY TO SPILL OVER INTO LIQUIDITY AND ASSET-QUALITY RISKS

The rating action was driven by social risk considerations, namely, the risks for the banking sector's liquidity stemming from the political instability. Since the country's presidential elections on 9 August, there has been widespread social unrest in Belarus (B3 stable). This heightened political instability is reflected in the interbank market and the behaviour of some depositors which increases pressure on bank liquidity. In addition, prolonged political turmoil would be disruptive for economic activity, already damaged by the coronavirus outbreak, and thus cause a more significant than expected deterioration in asset quality in the coming months.

The review for downgrade of the banks' ratings thus reflects the potential for political instability to spill over into both liquidity and asset-quality risks for banks.

On 12 August, the country's central bank, the National Bank of the Republic of Belarus (NBRB), said that banks' retail depositors increased withdrawals and moved cash savings to foreign currencies from the Belarusian ruble. The magnitude of the outflows is currently moderate, but if intensified, such outflows could have a material impact on banks' standalone creditworthiness, given the importance of retail customer deposits as one of the banks' key funding sources. These rising liquidity risks are partially mitigated by the three banks' solid liquidity cushions and the fact that a large portion of Belarus banks' retail deposits have longer maturities and cannot be withdrawn on demand. The NBRB will continue to provide liquidity to the system, and these three state-owned banks are likely to benefit from extraordinary support from the government of Belarus in case of need. However, this does not fully mitigate the risk of currency and maturity mismatches, because the banks' foreign-currency (FX) liquid assets do not fully cover their FX short-term liabilities. Moreover, the NBRB and the government are less able to support the banking system with FX liquidity because the sovereign has only modest foreign-currency reserves.