Over the past 12 months, Scope Ratings (Scope) has downgraded Estonia to A+ (from AA-), assigned a Positive Outlook on Lithuania’s single-A ratings, and affirmed Latvia’s A- rating. We see convergence in macro-fiscal risks between Lithuania and Estonia but a growing gap between them and Latvia.
Baltic governments continue to display some of the lowest public debt ratios in the euro area, but differences in fiscal policies are helping put debt trajectories on divergent courses in the context of the three countries’ more uneven economic performance.
As small, open economies, such divergence points to differing degrees of resilience should geopolitical risks related to Russia’s war in Ukraine increase in the months ahead amid uncertainties over US trade and foreign policies under a new Donald Trump presidency.
Estonia’s debt-to-GDP ratio is forecast to increase steadily to around 32% by 2029 while Latvia’s will remain broadly stable around 50%. We expect Lithuania’s debt-to-GDP to resume a gradually declining trend in the medium term to around 38% (Figure 1), underscoring a more positive view relative to the latest government forecasts of a progressive rise in public indebtedness.
Source: IMF, Scope Ratings forecasts
Higher Defence Spending, Interest Costs Pose Common Fiscal Challenges for the Region
Fiscal deficits in the Baltics have risen in recent years from the impact of recent shocks and persistent inflation-related spending pressures. In addition, the heightened geopolitical tensions in eastern Europe have a durable budgetary impact as governments spend more on defence, at around 3%-4% of GDP annually.
Direct military risks related to Russia’s war in Ukraine remain low due to the Baltics’ international alliances, but the countries’ proximity to Russia exposes them to spillover effects from the conflict, including broader security challenges such as cyber risks and disinformation campaigns. The Baltic countries are relatively well prepared compared with the rest of Europe, but a protracted conflict in Ukraine adds significant uncertainty to the medium-term fiscal outlook.
Moreover, high interest rates, although set to decline gradually, will increase interest payments across the region. We estimate net interest payments to increase to around 1.5%-3.0% of revenue over 2024-29, from 0.5%-1.5% in 2023.
Estonia’s fiscal balance will improve only gradually, reflecting weak economic momentum and structural spending increases (notably on education and social policy). The government deficit is expected to remain elevated at 3.1% of GDP in 2024 and 2.9% in 2025, although improving from previous Scope estimates thanks to the implementation of additional fiscal consolidation measures (Figure 2).
Similarly, Scope Ratings expects Latvia’s fiscal deficit to remain elevated at 3.1% of GDP in 2024 and 3.0% of GDP in 2025, with revenue-side pressures from the implementation of a labour tax reform next year.
Lithuania’s fiscal deficit is set to widen in 2025 to 2.5% of GDP (up 0.6pp from 2024) due to spending pressures from indexation mechanisms and fiscal stimulus for the economy, before declining in the subsequent years on strong growth in tax revenue.
Source: Eurostat, Scope Ratings
Lithuania’s Growth Prospects Diverge from Estonia’s and Latvia’s
Indeed, Lithuania’s economy has outperformed its neighbours’ (Figure 3), with growth that we estimate at 2.3% this year, and expected to rise to 2.9% in 2025 as private investment recovers and household consumption remains robust.
Manufacturing activity in Lithuania is experiencing a robust rebound (Figure 5), in part reflecting closer ties to Poland, where the economy has turned out to be among the fastest growing in Europe over 2023-24. Conversely, Estonian and Latvian manufacturing have suffered from their exposures to the weak Finnish and Swedish construction markets.
Lithuania’s economic recovery has also been driven by buoyant services exports (Figure 6), reflecting a structural transition away from low-tech manufacturing towards higher value-added services including financial services and IT.
Conversely, Estonia fell into a prolonged recession in 2022. Output contracted by an estimated 0.9% in 2024 and will recover only gradually, with growth forecast at 1.6% next year, as tax rises will likely hold back tentative recovery in private demand.
In Latvia, the economy made a rapid recovery after the pandemic but has since stagnated, set to shrink by 0.2% this year, down from a previous estimate of 1.6% growth after large positive data revisions for 2023 GDP. Improving consumption should still drive a recovery next year, with growth forecast at 1.5%.
Improving external demand should support growth across the region in 2025, although the risk balance remains tilted to the downside on the account of the fragile euro area economic outlook and uncertainties around global trade. External competitiveness will remain a key concern for all Baltic economies amid high nominal wage growth. Estonia’s export performance has been hit particularly hard by competitiveness pressures, as underlined by recent IMF estimates.
Declining Interest Rates Support Near-term Growth Prospects
Loosening financing conditions across the region should also support domestic demand in the near term, especially as very low leverage (particularly in Latvia and Lithuania) leaves households and corporates with significant headroom to borrow.
Credit growth has already picked up in Lithuania (Figure 7) amid strong business and household confidence and declining borrowing costs, which should support a recovery in private investment next year. In contrast, credit extension to the private sector is still subdued in Latvia, reflecting long-standing barriers to finance.
The recent lifting of US sanctions after a successful regulatory overhaul of the Latvian banking sector with healthy banking sector balance sheets should favour a pick-up in lending. The establishment of a regional hub of the Nordic Investment Bank in Riga is a sign of confidence. However, there are risks that the introduction of a new levy on banks’ net interest incomes will constrain credit supply, despite the inclusion of rebates that aim to raise lending volumes.
Source: ECB, Scope Ratings
For a look at all of today’s economic events, check out our economic calendar.
Brian Marly is a Senior Analyst in Sovereign and Public Sector ratings at Scope Ratings GmbH.
