The Average American Retires at 62. Buying These 3 Stocks Now Could Make Your Retirement Much More Comfortable.

In This Article:

Why are you investing? For most of us the ultimate goal is funding a nice retirement -- and the sooner, the better. To this end, the Motley Fool's in-house research arm reports the average American permanently calls it quits at the relatively early age of 62.

Problem: That's rather young. For perspective, your officially intended full retirement age (or FRA) for Social Security benefits is either 66 or 67 years of age, depending on when you were born. This FRA is also nearer the age most people say they're planning on retiring before they actually do so, as well as closer to the unspoken ideal age at which you've been able to save up enough money before you must start living on your savings.

Fortunately, it is possible to retire at such an early age without undermining your quality of life once you're done working. The key is buying and holding the right stocks to achieve an adequate amount of growth in a relatively short period of time. Namely, these tickers need to produce above-average growth without imposing above-average risk.

With that as the backdrop, here's a closer look at three stocks that could help find a comfortable retirement at 62 years of age.

1. PepsiCo

At first blush, PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP) doesn't look like a must-have investment. The beverage industry isn't a high-growth one, and yet it's still crowded thanks to its low barriers to entry. Never even mind that PepsiCo isn't even the biggest name in the business. That honor still belongs to rival Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO).

Dig deeper though. This may be one of the stock market's better-kept secrets.

Take how it differs from The Coca-Cola Company as an example. Whereas Coca-Cola's products are mostly made by third-party partners so the parent company can focus on what it does best -- marketing -- PepsiCo actually owns the bulk of its own bottling operations as well as production facilities for its Frito-Lay snack chip arm. Though this may mean more headaches and upfront costs, it ultimately provides the company with tighter control of its business. It also lowers its net operating costs, since it's not paying for bottlers' profit margins. This ultimately supports more consistent earnings and earnings growth.

Largely lost in all the noise is that this model is bearing more fruit for PepsiCo's shareholders than Coca-Cola's. Assuming you reinvested all the dividends both companies paid over the course of the past 30 years, you'd actually be far better rewarded for owning PepsiCo rather than Coke.