In This Article:
Apple Fellow Phil Schiller, the executive in charge of leading the App Store, testified in court on Monday that he had originally raised concerns about the 27% commission the iPhone maker planned to charge app developers on any purchases made outside the App Store. In addition to being a potential compliance risk, he suggested that the fee would create an "antagonistic relationship" between Apple and developers and seemed to require Apple to have audit rights to check whether or not they owed Apple money for the transactions that took place outside the App Store.
Apple typically charges a 30% commission on in-app purchases, but the reduced fee of 27% was a result of the Epic Games-Apple ruling. In 2021, the court determined that although the tech giant was not a monopolist, it would have to stop blocking app developers from linking to other ways for customers to pay beyond Apple's own in-app purchases (IAP).
Apple technically complied with the ruling by changing its App Store Guidelines to permit developers to link to their websites from their iOS and iPadOS apps to give customers an alternative way to pay.
However, Apple only reduced its commission by 3% for these purchases.
At the time, Fortnite maker Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney called out Apple for "bad-faith" compliance, saying the tech company undermined the 2021 order from U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, which had granted developers the right to add buttons or links to other purchasing mechanisms in addition to Apple's IAP.
Apple and Epic Games have since returned to federal court so Rogers could determine whether Apple violated her original order that forced the App Store to open to more competition.
According to Schiller's testimony, he initially objected to commissions on these outside purchases.
"… I had great concerns about the collections of funds from developers," he said, specifically "the change in the role of the App Store to now an organization that needs to collect money from developers."
He said he was worried about how the App Store would have to go after developers who didn't pay the commissions, making it "some kind of a collection agency" that had "rules around how we handle nonpayment and whether ultimately it means we're going to have to do audits of developers."
Schiller said he worried about "how all of those things change the relationship between Apple and developers in a way I thought would be detrimental."
The hearing has unearthed the extensive process Apple underwent while debating the merits of still charging a fee. With hosts of documents and emails, lawyers detailed the back-and-forth that took place internally at Apple as executives weighed different options regarding its compliance with the court's order.