Apollo Technology Capital Corporation Poses Questions That MediPharm Shareholders Should Ask on Management's Conference Call with Shareholders

In This Article:

Company Has Suspended Calls Since the Second Quarter of 2024 to Avoid Facing the Music for Board's and Management Team's Destruction of 99% of Stock's Value, Costing Shareholders $1 Billion 

Conference Call is a Blatant, Self-Serving Reaction by a Management Team Running Scared Following Apollo Capital's Intention to Nominate Six Highly Qualified Directors to MediPharm's Board 

Shareholders Deserve Answers From Management About Massive Underperformance, Failed
Operational Strategies, Poor Capital Allocation, Outrageous Compensation, and Lack of Transparency

Apollo Capital's Nominees Bring Significant Turnaround, M&A, and Operational Experience in Cannabis and Adjacent Industries, and Will Execute Plan to Restore Value for ALL MediPharm Shareholders

Urges MediPharm Shareholders to Vote for Wholesale Change at Annual Meeting

TORONTO, May 14, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Apollo Technology Capital Corporation ("Apollo Capital"), which together with its affiliates and associates collectively is one of the largest shareholders of MediPharm Labs Corp. (TSX: LABS) (OTCQB: MEDIF) (FSE: MLZ) ("MediPharm", "MediPharm Labs", or the "Company"), owning approximately 3.0% of the Company's common stock, today posed several critical questions that shareholders should ask MediPharm management on this morning's conference call following its first quarter 2025 earnings report. CEO David Pidduck and his management team have not held a call with shareholders since the second quarter of 2024 to avoid having to defend themselves after destroying 99% of the value of the company's stock, or nearly $1 billion.

The conference call is clearly a frightened reaction to Apollo Capital's recently announced intention to nominate six highly qualified director candidates to MediPharm's Board of Directors (the "Board") at the Company's upcoming 2025 Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held on June 16, 2025 (the "Annual Meeting"). After years of ignoring shareholder interests, MediPharm management has suddenly decided to engage now that it is facing a proxy contest that puts their outrageous compensation packages at risk.

On the call today, shareholders finally have an opportunity to demand answers from management to questions about critical issues, including:

  1. These numbers aren't even audited and MediPharm has been accused of misleading accounting practices in the past, including relating to revenue. Why should anyone believe anything that you say? Are you currently recognizing revenue the same way that you were two years ago? Please answer this question clearly without wordplay, subterfuge or material misrepresentations.

  2. You talk about things like 'profit' while you are hemorrhaging money on executive compensation and heading towards insolvency. Do you think that your shareholders or anyone else paying attention will be fooled by what you are saying today?

  3. After several quarters of not holding quarterly conference calls and ignoring shareholder interests, why are you all of a sudden holding one now? Is it only because you want our votes so you and the Board can remain in your roles and continue to operate MediPharm solely for personal gain despite destroying nearly all of the Company's value?

  4. MediPharm has been broken for years and you haven't even tried to fix it. Why should shareholders have confidence that you can execute after years of epic failure?

  5. MediPharm has burned significant cash over the years, bringing its current position to dangerously low levels. How can you possibly justify burning millions of dollars the Company desperately needs on a proxy contest it is clear you should not fight?

  6. How much cash does the company currently have? What is the current cash burn rate and how long do you expect it to last? How do you plan to invest in R&D given the precarious cash position?

  7. You have received outsized compensation, including stock grants and short-term incentives – despite MediPharm's poor performance resulting from your value-destructive actions. Why were these payments made when targets were clearly missed? Why have you not committed to primarily incentive-based packages in which future awards are only paid when you actually meet targets? If not, why?

  8. After the considerable failures of the past several years and your demonstrated inability to turn around the business, why are you resistant to a group of accomplished business leaders with relevant experience playing a role in rebuilding MediPharm. Is this as self-serving as it appears?

  9. If you were an institutional or retail shareholder of a company that lost more than 99% of its value, would you support the Board's and management's continued service?