Antengene Presents Results from Two Late-Stage Clinical Studies of Selinexor at ASH 2024

In This Article:

SHANGHAI and HONG KONG, Dec. 10, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Antengene Corporation Limited ("Antengene", SEHK: 6996.HK), a leading innovative, commercial-stage global biopharmaceutical company dedicated to discovering, developing and commercializing first-in-class and/or best-in-class medicines for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors, today announced that it presented the latest data from two clinical studies of selinexor in two posters at the 2024 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting (ASH 2024).

Logo (PRNewsfoto/Antengene Corporation Limited)
Logo (PRNewsfoto/Antengene Corporation Limited)

Details on the Posters:

Title: Weekly Selinexor, Bortizomib and Dexamethasone (SVd) Versus Twice Weekly Bortizomib and Dexamethasone (Vd) in Chinese Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): Primary Analysis of Phase III Bench Study
Publication Number: 4748
Session: 654. Multiple Myeloma: Pharmacologic Therapies: Poster III
Date: Monday, December 9, 2024
Time: 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM (Pacific time)
          10:00 AM - 12:00 PM, December 10, 2024 (Beijing time)

  • The BENCH study is a Phase III randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical trial, aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of selinexor, bortezomib and dexamethasone (SVd) regimen against bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) regimen in Chinese adult patients with R/R MM who have received one to three prior lines of therapy. At present, a New Drug Application (NDA) based this study has already been submitted to and accepted by China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA).

  • As of May 9, 2024, a total of 154 Chinese R/R MM patients were randomized to SVd group (n=101) or Vd group (n=53) and 152 patients received at least one dose of study drug (safety population).

  • Efficacy results showed that the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 8.1 months with SVd group and 6.3 months with Vd group. The overall response rate (ORR) was higher in SVd group than in Vd group. SVd group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with a very good partial response (VGPR) or better responses. The median time to response and the median duration of response were 0.8 vs 1.4 months and 9.7 vs 7.2 months (SVd vs Vd), respectively.

  • During the study, some subjects experienced treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most frequent Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) for SVd and Vd (≥10%) included thrombocytopenia, lymphocytopenia, and anemia. The incidence of Grade≥2 peripheral neuropathy (PN) was significantly lower in SVd than in Vd group.

  • The BENCH study has met its primary and key secondary endpoints, with results consistent with the BOSTON study. These results showed that the SVd regimen decreased the risk of progression and obtained much more profound responses compared to standard Vd regimen in Chinese patients with R/R MM. The incidence of Grade ≥2 PN were significantly reduced.