How America's tech giants reached 'crisis mode'

This week, ProPublica revealed that Facebook (FB) had, until recently, let advertisers target the news feeds of people who expressed interest in anti-Semitic topics like “How to burn Jews.”

This was just the latest PR disaster for the social network and, in fact, for America’s tech giants as a whole. Since the election of Donald Trump, the tech companies that consumers rely on to navigate the world and stay connected have come under more scrutiny — for hosting fake news and hateful content, for allegedly violating antitrust rules, and for killing jobs, to name a few areas of concern.

America’s tech giants could do no wrong just nine months ago, Scott Galloway, a professor of marketing at New York University’s business school, told Yahoo Finance. Now, he says, “They’re in crisis mode, all of them.”

‘The worm has turned against big tech’

The growing power of tech giants — coupled with Russian operatives on Facebook and the hate groups seemingly everywhere online — have created a perfect storm that could soon come crashing down on big tech, Galloway said.

A Facebook employee holds a laptop with a “like” sticker on it during an event at Facebook headquarters during an event at Facebook headquarters on April 4, 2013 in Menlo Park, California. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
A Facebook employee holds a laptop with a “like” sticker on it during an event at Facebook headquarters during an event at Facebook headquarters on April 4, 2013 in Menlo Park, California. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

“There is a movement afoot against the large tech companies. It’s coming from both directions: It’s coming from the far left who feel that they feel they destroyed jobs and hacked the election, and it’s coming from the far right who hate these companies as they feel they don’t have a seat at the table,” Galloway said, adding, “The worm has turned against big tech.”

A decade ago, Facebook had already become “the web’s hottest platform,” as Fred Vogelstein wrote in Wired. The following 10 years shed light on the social network’s drawbacks even as it became more ubiquitous (i.e., more and more people’s moms were joining Facebook). Facebook’s targeted advertising creeped out some users, and the site could also be fertile ground for cyber-bullies.

But those flaws paled in comparison to concerns that emerged following the US presidential election. That’s when it was accused of being a vehicle for spreading misinformation that helped defeat Hillary Clinton and elect Donald Trump. Rather than fading away, charges that Facebook swayed the election heated up after it revealed that a Russian company with Kremlin ties had purchased $100,000 worth of ads on polarizing social issues like gun control and immigration.

Meanwhile, a New York Times this month found that suspected Russian operators were using both Twitter (TWTR) and Facebook to disseminate anti-Clinton messages.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has denied Russian interference in the election. (Alexei Nikolsky, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP, File)
Russian President Vladimir Putin has denied Russian interference in the election. (Alexei Nikolsky, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP, File)

Facebook’s disclosure about the $100,000 in political ads prompted Sen. Mark Warner, D-VA, to question Facebook’s initial response to hints of election interference. “It appeared to me that the very social media sites that we rely on for virtually everything — our Facebooks, Googles and Twitters — it was my belief the Russians were using those sites to intervene in our elections,” Warner said earlier this month at the Intelligence & National Security Summit in Washington. “And the first reaction from Facebook was: ‘Well you’re crazy, there’s nothing going on’ — well, we find yesterday there actually was something going on.”