Abattis Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Defendants in King County, Washington State Court; Court Finds that Certain Defendants Breached Fiduciary Duties to Company in The...

Vancouver, BC / ACCESSWIRE / December 29, 2014 / Abattis Bioceuticals Corp. (the "Company" or "Abattis") (ATTBF) (CSE:ATT), a specialty biotechnology company with capabilities through its wholly owned subsidiaries of cultivating, licensing and marketing proprietary ingredients, bio-similar compounds, patented equipment and consulting services to medicinal markets in North America, wishes to advise its shareholders that on Monday December 15th the Company obtained a preliminary injunction from the Washington state court in King County against Herbal Analytics, LLC, James Baxter, Kaleb Lund, Lauren Hilty, and Erin Leary (the "HA Defendants"), Affinor Growers, LLC, and Nicholas Brusatore. Affinor Growers, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of defendant Affinor Growers, Inc. The Court's order implementing the preliminary injunction was entered December 23rd.

In its detailed ruling, the Court found that PhytaLab developed proprietary processes and procedures that enabled it to achieve a favorable position in the field of quality-assurance testing and product development. This proprietary information has independent economic value and is a trade secret of the Company. In the summer of 2014 while employees and members of PhytaLab and consultants with Abattis, Lund and Hilty in concert with Baxter and Brusatore, worked to form a competing business--Herbal Analytics. Following their resignations from PhytaLab, the defendants sought access to the trade secrets in order to facilitate Herbal Analytics I-502 laboratory certification application to the State of Washington. "Given these detailed findings of fact, we are pleased that the court recognized the innovation and creativity embodied in PhytaLab's proprietary information," said Mike Withrow, Company CEO. "We intend to fully recover from the defendants monetary damages, attorney's fees, and seek additional injunctive relief as necessary to correct for the defendants' duplicitous actions."

In its conclusions of law, the court held that: (1) Lund and Hilty had a duty to refrain from using confidential PhytaLab information and documents for the benefit of any entity other than PhytaLab and that Abattis/PhytaLab are likely to demonstrate at trial that Lund and Hilty breached this obligation; (2) PhytaLab's confidential information and documents used for making application of I-502 accreditation constitute protectable trade secrets and that Abattis/PhytaLab are likely to demonstrate at trial that the defendants' misappropriated these trade secrets; and (3) Abattis/PhytaLab are likely to demonstrate at trial that Lund and Hilty have willfully breached their fiduciary duty of loyalty and care to PhytaLab and have materially breached their obligations to Abattis under certain consulting agreements in establishing a competing business.