4 Reasons To Love Monthly Dividend Payers

Recently, I investigated installing solar panels on my roof to reduce my monthly energy bills.

The financial calculations are fairly involved. There is the cost of the panels, the additional cost to my homeowners insurance, a utility company rebate, a federal tax break, the cost of the energy I use and the cost of the energy I produce that I could sell back to the utility company.

It was just about the time that I was inundated with estimates when I received this email from a reader of my premium dividend advisory, The Daily Paycheck:

"Your newsletter is my favorite of all I receive. I have been concentrating on a portfolio of monthly dividend payers only to maximize monthly income. I have concentrated with those funds that pay a minimum of 7% or better. What are the pro and cons of this and what can I do to improve the strategy? (I'm addicted to monthly paychecks!)"
-- Thanks, Dave E., Escondido, Calif.

Dave's email reminded me that one of the best ways to tackle monthly bills -- is with monthly dividends.

Why Dividend Frequency Matters
When considering a new security, income investors search out its yield and investigate whether it can maintain its dividend. But more often than not, dividend frequency is overlooked.

On one hand, I understand the omission. After all, if a security pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share, what difference does it make it it pays $1.20 per share once a year or $0.10 per share 12 times a year?

All else being equal, however, a more frequent dividend payer is better than a less frequent dividend payer. This is especially true if you reinvest dividends.

1. The Higher the Frequency, the Faster the Growth
If you reinvest your dividends as I do, you will ultimately make more money with a monthly dividend payer than an annual dividend payer.

[More from InvestingAnswers.com: How to Succeed Where 1,471 Hedge Funds Failed]

In the chart below, I have compared the growth of $100,000 invested in securities yielding 7%. In one case the security makes monthly distributions and in the other case it makes an annual distribution. In both cases, dividends are reinvested. And for simplicity, I've assumed that the securities neither appreciate nor depreciate over time.

Initially there isn't much difference between the two positions. After the first year, the monthly payer has a slight edge, valued at $107,229 versus the $107,000 value of the annual payer. But as time goes on, the difference widens. After 10 years, the monthly payer is worth $4,251 more.

The sooner you reinvest a dividend, the more time it has to generate compound growth.