Question 3: What you need to know about the Pine Tree Power referendum

Oct. 2—First in a series

Question 3: Do you want to create a new power company governed by an elected board to acquire and operate existing for-profit electricity transmission and distribution facilities in Maine?

What would Question 3 do?

Question 3 proposes creating a new publicly owned and controlled power company by taking over the assets of Central Maine Power Co. and Versant Power, which together distribute 97% of Maine's electricity.

The new utility, called Pine Tree Power, is the focus of the most prominent of the eight ballot measures facing voters Nov. 7 and is at the center of a multimillion-dollar political fight played out at forums and ads on the internet and elsewhere.

How would the new utility operate?

Pine Tree Power would be regulated by the Maine Public Utilities Commission and governed by a seven-person board of directors, who would be elected by Mainers and then would appoint six others. The board would hire a third-party operator to oversee the day-to-day management of the grid — the power lines that bring electricity from transmission stations to homes and businesses. Neither CMP nor Versant would be eligible to bid on the third-party contract.

As regulated utilities, CMP and Versant are subject to PUC oversight over setting performance standards and how much profit they can earn. But they also are beholden to their corporate governance and shareholders as for-profit companies. They currently perform all the day-to-day management functions of the grid.

How would Pine Tree Power get the CMP and Versant assets?

The plan calls for Pine Tree Power to buy the assets — the network of lines, wires, trucks, facilities and other possessions — of the two companies. Backers and opponents disagree strongly on the cost. Supporters say it would be between $5 billion and $6 billion; opponents say it would be more than $13 billion. Both sides agree the sale price is likely to be disputed in court and could take years to settle. Taking the assets by eminent domain also is an option.

What are the main arguments of the Question 3 advocates?

Supporters say the arrangement ensures local control over the new utility. That would be in contrast to CMP, a subsidiary of Avangrid that's part of Iberdrola, a multinational electric utility company based in Spain, and Versant Power, part of ENMAX, which is headquartered in Canada.

They also say Pine Tree Power, as a government operation, could borrow money at much lower interest rates that could be directed to upgrade and expand the grid. A ratepayer-owned utility could borrow at 3% or 4% interest and investor-owned utilities face borrowing costs of 8% or more. They say the state will save $9 billion over 30 years.