20 Biggest Countries With Mandatory Military Service

In This Article:

In this article, we look at the 20 biggest countries with mandatory military service. You can skip our detailed analysis on reasons why these nations have introduced conscription by heading over directly to the 5 Biggest Countries With Mandatory Military Service.

Most countries across the world abolished mandatory military service after the end of the Cold War with the collapse of Communism, but several governments across Europe are again now considering bringing it back after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Latvia, which borders Russia, is planning to reintroduce conscription. Starting 2024, all men aged between 18 and 27 will have to go through mandatory military service for 11 months, and from 2028, about 7,500 Latvians will call for service every year.

Estonia and Finland never abolished mandatory military service, even whilst others did. Ukraine re-introduced mandatory military service after Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, and after Moscow ordered a full-scale invasion of the country in February 2022, the government in Kyiv enacted a law making all able men aged 18-60 subject to conscription. Lithuania introduced conscription in 2015 for all males between the age of 18 and 25.

Many countries in Asia as well have mandatory military service due to their security needs. Israel, for instance, mandates all Jewish, Druze or Circassian citizens over the age of 18 to serve in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). Arab citizens, religious women, married individuals, and medically unfit citizens can claim exceptions. South Korea and North Korea have been at loggerheads with each other for several decades. Both countries have mandatory military service, a law born out of the possible need for manpower if a war were to break out between the two neighbors.

Problem with Conscription

Conscription presents its own challenges and may not be the answer to a country’s military needs. For starters, it is likely to face opposition domestically and internationally from human rights groups for being anti-democratic and for the risks associated with the lives of those who are asked to serve in the military involuntarily. Moreover, it is an increased cost to the exchequer and may leave little room for countries to develop military capabilities, such as advanced technologies and weapons systems.

Possession of modern, sophisticated weapons is likely to prove more potent in armed conflicts than having a sizable military force. This has already been witnessed in Ukraine, where Kyiv, heavily armed by the West, has been able to turn the tide of the war against a formidable, large Russian military which has thus far failed to find its way in the war due to much of its weaponry being old and outdated. Another example is that of the conflict between Israel and Palestine in the Middle East, where Tel Aviv has largely been able to assert authority due to its sophisticated weapons and defense systems. The Iron Dome, Israel’s missile defense system, has intercepted thousands of missiles and rockets fired from Gaza during the ongoing escalation with a 90% success rate. On the other hand, Hamas has mainly been on the receiving end after the ‘surprise attack’ launched by its fighters on Israel on October 7.