15 Countries with the Largest Uranium Reserves in the World

In This Article:

In this piece, we will take a look at the fifteen countries with the largest uranium reserves in the world. For more countries, head on over to 5 Countries With the Largest Uranium Reserves in the World.

The growth in the awareness of global warming and the risks of greenhouse gas emissions has spurred a shift towards renewable energy. Leading the charge is solar power, as harnessing the Sun's energy does not lead to harmful emissions that are generated from traditional power generation sources such as coal or oil fired power plants.

However, while wind and solar power both sound attractive on paper, in reality, the picture is different. In fact, a study by Stanford University believes that even if companies were to shift to 100% renewable energy, this shift will not automatically lead to 100% carbon free energy. Stanford states that solar panels actually end up overstating carbon emissions reduction estimates since they generate peak power in the afternoon - when most firms' generators are sitting idle. However, at night, companies source their electricity from the grid, which then ends up in greenhouse gas emissions. According to the university, if gas emissions are calculated annually, then a 100% shift to solar would reduce a firm's greenhouse footprint by 119%; however, if emissions are calculated hourly, the emissions are reduced by 66% only.

A policy paper from the Brookings Institute lays bare the fallacy of relying on solar and wind power for an emissions free future. It points out that since wind and solar power plants operate at peak capacity for only a fraction of the time, they have to be backed up by traditional coal or gas fired power plants. In fact, Brookings points out that due to this crucial drawback, it takes six solar plants and four wind power plants to generate enough power as a single coal fired plant. Puts things into perspective, doesn't it?

However, not all is lost in the quest for an emissions free future. As Brookings also shares, nuclear power provides a net benefit of four cents per kilowatt hour - the amount saved after the costs of setting up and operating a plant are factored into analysis. On the other hand, both wind and solar provide negative net benefits. A nuclear power plant also has the benefit of being able to run 90% of the time, since it is not reliant on peak wind or sunlight. The argument for nuclear is also bolstered by the Oxford University Press. According to OUP, nuclear is humanity's best option to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, as it shares that France is the best example of this since the French baseload electricity is almost entirely generated by nuclear. Baseload electricity is the minimum power that must be supplied to the grid, which makes solar and wind power unsuitable for power generation.