Apple Watch woes 'a temporary blip': Analyst

In This Article:

After a patent ruling caused Apple (AAPL) to pull its latest Apple Watch models from shelves, tech analyst Ray Wang joined Yahoo Finance to discuss investor implications. He believes near-term sales impacts will prove "a temporary blip."

Wang notes Masimo (MASI) waited until watches released to sue, so purchases already occurred. With Apple likely to return with redesigned models after this "predatory" suit, Wang doesn't expect substantial revenue loss.

Looking ahead, Wang argues Apple's AR-focused Vision Pro headset slated for February unveiling is more of a long-term play unlikely to see the frenzy of other launches initially.

For more expert insight and the latest market action, click here to watch this full episode of Yahoo Finance Live.

Video Transcript

JOSH LIPTON: Meanwhile, it's been a busy few weeks for tech to close out 2023. Just today, Apple pulling some of its watches off its website over a patent dispute and the reporter release of the Vision Pro coming in February. Joining us now is Ray Wang, Constellation Research founder and principal analyst.

Ray, it is good to see you. Let's get right to this watch news, Ray. So Apple halting sales of its newest watches. The ITC saying Apple violated patents. If you're an investor in Apple, you're watching right now, Ray, analysts estimate the watch probably accounts for about 5% of total company revenue. So this is a serious business. How worried should you be if you're an investor?

RAY WANG: You know, I don't think I'd be that. Worried I'm wearing one of them right now, as you can see. And I think the issue really is, if you look at the way the patents and the filing was made, the company Massimo, who builds the sensors, basically waited for Apple to launch and put the watch out before they filed the lawsuit. And it's actually very interesting to see how that plays out.

So I think you're going to see a temporary blip for Christmas sales. But would the watch come back? I think it's highly likely to see it come back, because it looks like a very, very interesting lawsuit. At first, it looks like a patent infringement lawsuit, but it also looks more like an interesting patent-- predatory patent lawsuit. And I think that's what investors should realize.

There's two sides of that story. One is there may be a patent lawsuit coming from Massimo, but there are also did it in a way that was seen very, very predatory to the market. And so I think that's what will ultimately be found out when the judge looks at this.

JOSH LIPTON: But, Ray, I'm just curious how you think this actually ends, though. Do you think it's does the White House step in? Is there some type of settlement that Apple does with Massimo?