‘The entire apple orchard is poisoned’: Experts call out for-profit college marketing tactics

Listen on Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts

This is the second part of Yahoo Finance’s Illegal Tender podcast series on for-profit colleges. Listen to the episode here.

Despite various controversies, for-profit schools remain exceptionally good at one thing: marketing themselves.

From the slick TV ads to the savvy recruiting tactics — some as simple as presenting an opportunity to an underserved group — these colleges have proven efficient at outreach.

“When you are just a business person and you are focused on what are the things that we can do to get more students to enroll and to increase the margin. … If that's what's driving your daily decisions, you will end up being a predatory school,” Bob Shireman at the Century Foundation told Illegal Tender.

“Because you can make a lot of money by enrolling vulnerable people who don't really realize what they're getting into,” Shireman added, “who are borrowing a lot of money for college and who are enrolled in classes, taught by people who are not paid enough for what they're being asked to do.”

A recent report by Brookings Institution found that for-profit colleges spend the most money on ads among types of colleges and the smallest share of students.

For-profit colleges spend the most on ads. (Chart: Brookings Institution)
For-profit colleges spend the most on ads. (Chart: Brookings Institution)

In 2017, public colleges spent $171,000 on advertising and non-profit colleges spent $273,000. For-profit colleges? $1.25 million.

That’s roughly $371 spent on ads per student, as compared to the $14 a public college spends on ads per student.

“All the research I was doing, it wasn't a few bad apples — the entire apple orchard was poisoned,” Alex Shebanow, director of ‘Fail State,’ a documentary about for-profit colleges, told Yahoo Finance’s Illegal Tender. “It was hard to find a for-profit that was of good value to the students.”

Trace Urdan, a former Wall Street analyst who covered the for-profit industry and is now “passionate believer in the constructive role of private capital in driving education innovation,” pushed back against the argument that for-profit schools are inherently corrupted by business incentives.

“This is the frustration that exists in the sector,” Urdan told Illegal Tender. “So yes, there are definitely bad actors and good actors. There are some that are sort of cynical. There are some that are simply unsophisticated. There's a lot of these that are family run businesses and some of it is structural. You get into the cosmetology space, and it's incredibly complicated in cosmetology because we have all these state regulations that require students to receive an obscene amount of training in order to qualify for licensure to cut somebody's hair. So, then you have to have schools that will... provide all of those hours of instruction for the students.”