Why the most sought after man in Republican politics took on a radically different role in 2016

AP_857293325933
AP_857293325933

(AP Photo/Charles Dharapak) Spencer Zwick, then national finance chairman for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, speaks at a campaign fundraising event in Salt Lake City, Utah, in 2012.

When Spencer Zwick looks back at the "defining moments" of the 2012 election, an obvious one sticks out.

Zwick, who ran the massive fundraising operation for 2012 Republican nominee Mitt Romney that raised nearly $1 billion, saw firsthand how the then imperfect version of "opposition research" hit his candidate's campaign hard.

In September of that year, a bombshell video showed Romney dismissing the "47%" of people dependent on government handouts, who he said would vote Democratic "no matter what."

That video was not discovered by President Barack Obama's campaign or even a traditional news outlet. It was filmed at a fundraiser and unearthed by James Carter IV, then a freelance opposition researcher who tipped off Mother Jones. But it became an ever present theme of the campaign's last two months, as Democrats used it to torch Romney as an out-of-touch plutocrat.

"The opposition used that very effectively. They used 47% as a way to define Mitt Romney," Zwick told Business Insider in a recent interview. "There's an old saying in politics: If you're explaining, you're losing. And it required Gov. Romney to explain what he had said."

The good news for Republicans in the 2016 election cycle: If there are moments like that on the Democratic side, the GOP is going to have an elaborate effort to try and find them. That's what's behind Zwick's announcement that he will chair opposition-research firm America Rising PAC, despite being one of the most wanted men in Republican politics after Romney announced he wouldn't run for a third time in 2016.

He'll work as a volunteer on the PAC and continue in his capacity as a managing partner at the firm Solamere Capital. But signing on with America Rising, a more than two-year-old firm founded in the wake of the 2012 campaign, means he'll stay neutral in a crowded primary field of more than a dozen Republican candidates.

For Zwick, it wasn't a hard choice. He feels that ultimately, opposition research will have just as much — if not more — say in influencing the eventual outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Campaigns are now run through an ever increasing number social-media platforms, he explained, and candidates have become all the more visible.

"After 2012, I spent a lot of time thinking about how I could have impact in the 2016 cycle," Zwick said. "There were a lot of lessons learned for me in 2012 about what the ingredients are for a campaign. Anytime you have an experience like that, I think it presents an opportunity to reflect and what didn't. ... 2012 was really the first social-media campaign that had existed in presidential politics."