Where Should I Put My Emergency Fund? (Besides the Mattress)

Where Should I Put My Emergency Fund? (Besides the Mattress) · Credit.com

Are you trying to decide if you need an emergency fund? Do you already know that you need one and are just looking for a way to start saving? Perhaps you want an emergency fund with a little extra yield. If any of these scenarios sound like you, keep reading because there's little bit of something here for everyone.

If You Don't Have an Emergency Fund

Unfortunately, many people may find themselves unprepared for even a modest expense when it arises. If you're a glass-half-full kind of person, it's important to realize that luck and chance happen to us all. Having to buy a new tire for the car, fixing the home air conditioner or covering your annual deductible can be a nuisance, let's be honest. In this day and age, though, that isn't the worst thing that could happen. Many people in the past 15 years have suffered through layoffs, restructuring and downsizing. Some of you may have been in poor health or had to take time off from work to help a sick family member.

With that in mind, how much should you really have saved if you want to cover something a little more dire than the washing machine going out on? First, let's look at the general guidelines provided by most financial advisers and then compare those guidelines to real life by looking at some numbers provided by the federal Bureau of Labor and Statistics.

Years ago, when I was studying to become a Certified Financial Planner, the general rule of thumb for emergency savings was multi-tiered and went something like this. If you are a dual-income household you would want to save enough to cover three months' worth of expenses, and if you are a single-income household you need to be able to cover six months' worth of expenses.

On the surface, this sort of makes sense and at the very least gives you a reasonable benchmark to shoot for. However, it's important to realize that these guidelines were developed within a framework that assumed that the client was financially responsible within all areas of their lives (i.e. they didn't carry massive amounts of credit card debt, had a reasonable car payment, and didn't buy more house than they could reasonably afford). On top of that, the information used to develop these guidelines was mostly based on employment data from the '80s and '90s. The problem with this is that since the end of the '90s, we've had a tech bubble, a housing bubble, a freeze in the credit markets and an energy bubble, all contributing to longer periods of unemployment for large swaths of the population.

How long are we talking here? Well, despite unemployment being in the low 5% range for the past four months, according to the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, the data also indicates that the average length of unemployment has been between 26 and 31 weeks (6–7.5 months) with the median between nine to 12 weeks (2.5–3 months). So what does this mean for you? It means that if you were to save three months of living expenses and lose your job, then you'd better hope that you fall into the median and not the average. While any amount of money set aside for emergencies is better than nothing, the most current data from the BLS indicates that your target for savings should be more in the 6-9 month timeframe. Now logic tells us that this is probably enough, but I'm a firm believer in Murphy's Law, which states that anything bad that can happen, will happen, and at the most inopportune time.