Joseph Lebel

Thanks, Chris. Non-maturity deposits remain relatively stable, decreasing approximately 1% compared to the prior quarter, while overall deposit balances declined by approximately 2%, reflecting our planned continued runoff of brokered CDs and a decline in high-yield savings balances driven by targeted refinements to both marketing efforts and rates offered.
On the loan origination side, we saw modest decline in loan balances of less than 1%, driven by reduced demand from customers combined with price and credit discipline. Given the slow start to the year, growth in loans and deposits may be modest for the remainder of 2024 growth is expected to be lower in Q2, but ramp up in the second half of the year. Said another way, we expect our 2024 year end loan balances to be higher than 2023 by low to mid single digits with the majority of the growth coming in the third and fourth quarters.
Asset quality metrics remained strong with nonperforming loans and criticized and classified assets representing 0.35% and 1.65% of total loans, respectively. We reported 0.01% in net charge-offs the average total loans for the quarter, which marks essentially no net charge-offs in 11 of the last 12 quarters.
With that, I'll turn it over to Pat to review margin and expense up.

Patrick Barrett

As you know, GAAP net interest income and margin were $86 million and 2.81%, respectively, reflecting the continued replaced repricing of assets offset side the higher interest expense from a continued modest mix shift in funding Chris noted funding costs reflect cycles and deposit betas 40% of minus 38% in the prior quarter. While initial signs show relative stability stabilization in net interest margin. This is subject to unpredictability around loan growth and funding mix trends. So you shouldn't be surprised to see either stability or possibly some modest compression in the near term.
GAAP noninterest expenses decreased linked quarter to $59 million. We continue to make every effort to hold operating expenses stable in the $58 million to $60 million per quarter range, but modest quarterly volatility may occur.
Our effective tax rate for the quarter of 27% included a onetime nonrecurring charge of $1.2 million. Excluding this charge, the full year effective tax rate is expected to remain at 24% in line with prior periods and guide.
Finally, as Chris mentioned, earlier capital strengthened appreciably with growth in our CET1 ratio to 11%. Pleased to report capital accretion even while repurchasing 958,000 shares for approximately $15 million during the quarter.
At this point, we'll begin the question-and-answer portion of the call.

Question and Answer Session

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Frank Schiraldi, Piper Sandler.

Frank Schiraldi

Morning, Frank, I just wanted to ask about the NIM in the I believe in the slide deck, you talked about the CET1 ratio remaining above 10% and obviously, it's well above. They're now at 11% on and thinking about some modest growth in the back half of 2024 seems like you could if you want to do even, you know, return, you get 100% plus of our earnings through a buyback so I'm just trying to get a sense of when you talk about to that or that 10% threshold, how aggressive you could be on capital return stock at these levels on and on and yes, your thoughts about term capital, I guess over the next medium term here.

Christopher Maher

And Frank, it's Chris. I look, we're very comfortable with where we are in the capital ratios today, I think we have a little bit of room, but we also anticipate returning to growth. So we don't want to we don't want to use up any of that excess capital that we might want later in the year for growth, I think like you saw in the first quarter, if you just think about it this way, we're not using repurchases to increase our leverage for using all the free cash flow that we're not using for growth fund repurchases. And if if the pricing remains around this level, I would expect that to continue.

Frank Schiraldi

Yes, Chuck, I appreciate that. And then as you think about growth in the back half of this year and maybe beyond, just curious, any targets on in terms of because we think about commercial real estate concentration, if you could just remind us where that is currently as a percentage of total capital and any sort thoughts about trend there going forward?

Christopher Maher

So Frank, I think the way to think about it is that we're comfortable with our CRE exposure today, but we will not be increasing it. So what we're doing is as loans mature. In some cases, you know, we're allowing those depending on the credit structure to move off the balance sheet and replacing them with other borrowers. But that's kind of a treading water position. So most of the growth you're going to see is in classes outside of CRE, so that the right way to think about it.

Frank Schiraldi

Okay. And then just finally and obviously home office has been a focus of investors and I know you don't have much in the central business districts, but I wondered if you could maybe just spend a second or two on your larger loans. I mean, I believe that average ticket as an average, I know you're willing to follow one to $2 million in size. But if you could just spend a second on maybe on your on your larger loans and how they're performing and the geography of their bank.

Christopher Maher

Frank, I'll give you a couple of thoughts, and then I'll have Joe walk you through some of the numbers.
First, as we've talked before, our exposure in central business district is quite low and all credits that we feel very comfortable with. So we've been through that book.
One important note, I've shared this with a number of folks. You know, our rum exposure in central business district in Manhattan, for example, totals just $16 million in the balance sheet where we're talking about very low numbers. The vast majority of the portfolio is suburban office and in smaller sized loans. But Joe, maybe walk through some of those of the stats you have that might be helpful.

Joseph Lebel

I'll just give you a couple of Frank. So we have about 87% of the loans or are under 10. And actually the weighted average size of those loans is about $1.8 million. And we only have nine loans over $25 million in the portfolio. And that includes alone, I think we've been pretty transparent about in the CBD book, which is it a very well-known national pharmaceutical company and another very well-known confectionary company where it's their U.S. headquarters. So we're pretty confident pretty positive of the another very large loan is a is a headquarters of one of the big four banks of regional headquarters, one of the big four banks in the country. So that's the three, the three, the nine larger loans over $25 million.

Frank Schiraldi

Okay. And I guess if we're thinking about central business district and forgive me, I forget exactly what you have total, but is that kind of the bulk you look at the stuff over $25 million is kind of the CBD stuff.

Christopher Maher

There's a correlation there. Certainly the largest tends to be in CBDs where you'd see bigger buildings. But the the entirety of the CBD book is about $125 million. And then each of the loans that Joe mentioned is part of that or they all happen to be in CBDs term.

Frank Schiraldi

Okay. Appreciate it.

Joseph Lebel

Thanks, Frank.

Operator

Tim Switzer, KBW.

Frank Schiraldi

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my question.

Christopher Maher

Morning, Tim.

Tim Switzer

I wanted to follow up on your comments about the loan demand you've seen recently and still a little bit less demand from customers is do you think part of that is driven by in expectation for rates to be lower by the end of the year. And so there may be waiting for that for is that macro related fears Could you maybe just provide some color around the lower demand?

Joseph Lebel

Tim, it's Joe. I would tell you that was absolutely the case really in the year, January, February, I think people were looking for some relief before taking on either an M&A transaction, a new business line, maybe some capital expenditure purchases, but we're seeing that moderate. I think people are coming to the realization that that may not necessarily be the case.
The other thing that we're seeing is that we're seeing a little bit more renewed confidence. People have been able to pass along increases that some of the product costs we're seeing that obviously inflation. So we've seen subsequent to quarter end a little bit of an increase in pipelines. So we're seeing those green shoots start, which is a positive for us. And I think as Chris mentioned, early earlier, the vast majority of the increase in the pipe is coming from the C&I book, which is a which is really where we've been focused.

Tim Switzer

Okay, got it. And on, could you remind us or update us on what you guys believe the impact of rate cuts would be in the back half of the year to the to NI? And particularly if we only get a one or two rate cuts, how would that be different than if we got, say, a series of 5%.

Christopher Maher

So it's Chris can probably chime in as well. But I give you just a sense that whether it's a incremental cut up or were even down. So I think we're looking at thinking about it both ways these days doesn't make a big change. So we're relatively a stable outlook regardless of whether it's two cuts or even one race right now those kinds of scenarios. So it's not it's not going to be a big impact. We do have a significant amount of loans that are maturing contractually maturing in the last three quarters of the year. And I think one of the ways we're thinking about higher for longer is we some things we know for certain and some things we're just going to have to see play out. But on the certainty side, we know what's rolling and we've got about $700 million worth of loans rolling contract fixed rate loans that are contractually hitting their maturity in Q2 three and four were there reset. So as a result, that $700 million is going to come up from where it is today. That's a significant opportunity. On the other hand, there will be a lingering deposit pressure and it's abating, but it's very hard to say exactly how that will look as the year goes on. So higher for longer doesn't concern us, particularly on and one or two cuts or one raise doesn't change the outlook much either so it's a relatively stable outlook for US patent and he'd add to that.

Patrick Barrett

No, I guess I would just yes, I would just emphasize the whole uncertainty factor that we're really looking at is around the non-maturity deposit funding side. On the term side, the loan side entirely the securities book entirely CDs, another term funding, we've got pretty high level of confidence is just the unpredictability of behavior of depositors in the interest-bearing space, non-interest bearing space that has proven really difficult for us to predict. It's hard to see that confidence level building in the near term, I think we're just going to have to see some trends develop before we have better confidence, and that's why you see that our wording on our outlook for them be very cautious around stable. It might be a little compressing. I could have said that it might even expand a little bit, but just a naturally cautious guy.

Tim Switzer

Yes, okay. Got it. That was all really helpful. And a quick one last question. Can you remind us what percent of your loans are repriced?

Christopher Maher

Immediately, it's the floating rate of 30%.

Tim Switzer

Great. Thank you.

Operator

Daniel Tamayo, Raymond James.

Daniel Tamayo

I appreciate the guidance on the range for expenses in the $58 million to $60 million per quarter through the year. I was hoping if we can get a finer point on maybe the cadence of expense growth, does it just kind of implied volatility each quarter through that $58 million to $60 million range? Or should we kind of expect a little bit of a ramp up as we go through the year here?

Patrick Barrett

No, I think you should expect it to be flat from throughout the year, but it could bounce around a little bit you just do have some volatility, but we're going to work really hard to keep it below 59 and we put the range out there so that you can do the math and come up with 59, which is a pretty good average estimate. But you should expect that that's the one thing everyday that we know that we can control. It's not up to customer behavior.

Daniel Tamayo

And then maybe Additionally, there is there any timing, any of any additional initiatives that you guys are working through that are implemented through the year?

Christopher Maher

I'm just I mean, the only thing that we would anticipate doing over the course of the year is we always hire good talent when we find in the markets. So if we find good talent, good commercial bankers, we're going to hire them. We have some room in the budget to do that. We have other expenses that are coming down. So for hiring our typical pattern of a few people every quarter, we can hold expenses right where they are. If we find an opportunity to do something better than that, then we'll change our expense guidance and let you know, but that would be, in our view, a very positive outcome. So any volatility, significant volatility in expenses would be linked to something that we think would be good news.

Daniel Tamayo

Are there, Chris? And then maybe lastly, just looking kind of at the fee lines, you're kind of looking stripping out the noise of some deal equity gains in the trust sale again, taking out the yes, the whole week during the quarter, we kind of just imply a run rate a little bit under 9 billion and kind of with the main variance being a little bit lighter service charge than we were looking for that kind of 9 million level, kind of fair to look at a run rate going forward? Or was there kind of maybe some seasonality or one-time things in the service charges that may boost that going forward?

Christopher Maher

It is seasonality would not play a significant role, but I'm always cautious on this line given public policy around fees. And I would expect that as we continued the dialogue over which fees are more less responsible than others, you could have some some vulnerability there to fees. We may decide to change to make sure we're in line with the current regulatory thinking about seasonality wouldn't come into it. This is really just kind of listening to the to our regulators into their views on different fee lines may may cause us to reexamine fees and next few quarters.

Daniel Tamayo

Thanks for the color, guys.

Christopher Maher

Thank you.

Operator

David Bishop, Hovde Group.

David Bishop

Yes, and good morning, gentlemen, we did Joe quick question in terms of maybe the outlook for low to mid-single digit growth, mostly in the back half. Is it dumb, you know, obviously the pipeline numbers that have come under pressure here, Jeff, sort of line of sight in terms of maybe what's beyond the published numbers in terms the greater than 90 day pipeline that gives you confidence that you may hit those bogeys in the second half of the year?

Joseph Lebel

Yes, Dave, I think the easier answer is this we had done we've added eight C&I lenders last year, you know, it takes them some time to ramp up. We've added two more in the first quarter. We have a couple of more scheduled to start pretty much any day here in Q2. So we're absolutely seeing an increase in pipe subsequent to the end of Q1. I think you're going to see that start to filter through closings in Q2 into Q3. And I expect the folks that are that have finally gotten to that point where they're ramping up to continue to bring that kind of business to us. So I think that's the measure of what we're seeing so far and what our expectations are.

David Bishop

Got it. And then I saw in the slide deck some narrative regarding the high-yield savings product. Sounds like you move down pricing, that looks like the spot rate was down 30 basis points from the quarterly average from my reading, right, that overall balances have remained stable and is there more opportunity to move those rates that maybe that they are in the money market or interest bearing checking?

Christopher Maher

I think we're in the good news is we're in the fine tuning stage of this rate cycle, meaning we're kind of deciding which ones we want to keep at what prices and money that may not be economical for us to keep and we can kind of pull back office. So that stability is of is a welcome change. We see we saw that in the fourth quarter coming into the first quarter. Let's be clear, when we reduce those rates, we lost some deposits. That's why you saw some of the deposit contraction in Q1, but that was planned. We knew when we actually hit pretty much what we expected to in terms of attrition in the high-yield book. So I would expect us to be fine tuning deposit pricing over the course of the year. One of the questions we get often it goes back to Fed rate policy and people trying to predict. Are there going to be cuts and all that? Obviously, we care a lot about what the Fed does. But I would not assume that there is any linkage between Fed rate policy and deposit rate expectations. Depositors are going to want what they want. They going to shop where they shop. And and that's that's what makes it a little bit difficult at this point in the cycle to kind of get a beat on things. We certainly feel the pressure is easing, but it is way too early to make a longer-term blanket statement of it.

David Bishop

Got it. And then in the same vein, is there any sort of outlook in terms of broker deposits, maybe maturing or this quarter and over time, we generally want to just continue to reduce that brokerage segment.

Christopher Maher

Traditionally, we have not relied on brokered funding. We saw it as a really good option that kind of bolster liquidity at a time when it made a lot of sense to do so. And it is a great option to manage interest rate risk. So what we did with our brokered book is we went out right after rates. First started to rise and we immediately kind of pull down funding that we knew we would have a very certain interest rate characteristics to it for a duration now that we're somewhere near the top end of the cycle, extending the duration through brokered CDs doesn't make sense. So rolling them off also take six, not just volatility out, but allows us to maybe become a little bit more liability sensitive.

David Bishop

And then one final question. Looks like maybe on a modest tick-up in the special mention loan category, maybe looks to be office CRE. Just curious, but maybe some commentary on what drove the change in risk rating?

Joseph Lebel

Yes, Dave, I'll give you a little feedback. It's primarily three loans. One, just a little color. One was a construction of build to suit. There's a little delay getting the tenant and the tenant is in and paying the two other loans. One was a most office loan at Philadelphia, which is which is fully fully occupied, but just some little bumps in the road with the principle, I think two of the three, if not all three, are cleaned up by the end of Q2, but it's just prudent to put them in the category where they belong here, we have some concerns.

David Bishop

Got it. Appreciate the color.

Operator

Christopher Marinac, Janney Montgomery Scott.

Christopher Marinac

Good morning. I'm just going to continue where Dave left off on his last question. So if we look at the level of criticized loans, did you see that driving at all your reserve levels going forward? Or is the reserves still build on kind of across the cycle and the low charge-offs? Does it continue to kind of speak for itself?

Christopher Maher

No, I think, Chris, it's a good question. I don't think there's any linkage there. We don't expect any kind of going forward unless there's a change in the outlook, which frankly we don't see. So where I would think about it is if you look at the allowance this quarter, if we had just gone with the external observable factors, both the economic forecast as well as our history of charge-offs. And you might have made an argument to release reserves. We didn't think that was prudent at this point in the cycle. So our qualitative factors came up a little bit, but that's kind of what's going on that quantitatively. It would have been a quarter where you could have considered releasing. I know some banks have we just chose to be a little more conservative.

Christopher Marinac

Great. And then just a follow-up about overall commercial growth on where do you think customers are now I mean, we know there's a lot of pencils down with the large regionals, but given that you may not want to do commercial real estate as you mentioned. So just specifically in C&I, where is the customer attitude? And is are you dependent on them kind of being more optimistic in the second half of the year?

Joseph Lebel

Yes, I think we all are, but I think we're seeing already the conversations we're having are that customers are getting a little bit more optimistic. I think the other thing is we've continued to recruit lenders largely from from the nationals. And largely what we're hearing a lot of or from our new folks is that there is a limited appetite for any type of lending at the highest level, which is beneficial for us as time goes on, it's still a relationship business. So I expect that to be the case.
On the CRE side, you know, it's fascinating. We've talked about this a bit. I think there's a little bit of a limitation on banks wanted to do creep, but there are plenty of alternative lenders in the space. And one of the ones we talk about a bunch is the government entities. And we saw that a little bit in Q1 that that was prevalent. But one of our better borrowers refinanced the $26 million transaction with with one of the GSEs at 6% fixed with an extended IO period. We're not pricing like that, and we're not structuring like that. And that's still that's still a challenge. But in today's world, I don't think that's monumental. It's just something to be aware of.

Christopher Maher

Maybe one more comment to Chris, that the interesting phenomenon we've noticed among our long-term kind of generational C&I clients. It's a good news story to this is they have virtually no debt. They've paid all their lines and loans down. So that affects our earnings a little bit because we're not showing those outstandings, but these families have shared with us that they're poised and ready. I'm sure you might add to that, but there at some point they will become net borrowers.

Joseph Lebel

Again, we hope that in the next couple of quarters we told that we've told that story of one of our better C&I clients has been chasing two other acquisitions for peer years and not been successful. And now we finally believe he will be successful and with his balance sheet and our ability to lend. I think he finally gets that opportunity. But it's people are cautious still there's still some of that market.
Great.

Christopher Marinac

Thank you again for the background here. Appreciate it.

Christopher Maher

Thanks, Chris.

Operator

Matthew Breese, Stephens Inc.

Matthew Breese

Hey, good morning, everyone. And the I guess the obvious question is, is how much more should we expect in the way of buybacks? I think you have a remaining $2 million share authorization. So I guess first part, is it reasonable to assume that that gets exhausted by the end of the year, but the second part is just more of a philosophical one. I can't remember the last time I saw OceanFirst buyback this many shares, and I would love to hear kind of capital strategy in light of valuation and the environment and in light of the other options you have on the table?

Christopher Maher

It's a great question, Matt. I think just a really simple answer for it. When we look at the value of our shares and we think there's an opportunity there. We feel very good about the balance sheet. We feel very good about credit. We feel very good about our long-term prospects in the sector, including U.S. is just trading at a reasonably cyclical lows. So as long as we're below tangible book value, it's a very compelling investment decision. That said, to your earlier point that we were a growth company and we're anxious to be back in the growth side. But we do get this opportunity as we grow loans in the second half of the year, we have the opportunity potentially with margin stabilization and a little bit of growth to see some earnings power as well. So if we're returning to growth, you're going to see earnings growth as well, which should provide some more growth capital to. So we don't want capital levels to drift up. We do have certain floors. We want to make sure we're above, but trading below substantially below tangible book value for us. It's just a unique opportunity.
And you asked about the outlook for the first quarter probably represent I couldn't see us doing more than that because we do want to preserve capital for growth. But if we continue to do anywhere near that level by the end of the year, we would fulfill our current plan and we'd have to think about whether we wanted to do another plan. So I think it's going to depend a lot on Believe it or not kind of margins structure and growth opportunities we can bring on new clients, but we want to make sure we're bringing them on at the right margins. It is not the right part of the cycle you give up your margin discipline and Chase, just like standalone EPS at the end of what could be a multiyear expansion?
The soft landing is not off the table. But you could also imagine that by 25, we're in a recession, right? I mean, we don't know what the Fed's going to have to do later in the year. So so we're not going drive capital levels down, but at these prices, if we have excess capital we're going to use.

Matthew Breese

I appreciate that. And then turning to credit Yes. I just was curious about the actual process for getting LTVs and getting debt service coverage ratios. Is the LTV at origination or is it more recent if you have kind of an average age of LTV, that would be great. And then on the debt service coverage ratio, are those updated annually? Are those fairly fresh?

Christopher Maher

So the couple of things, Matt, so the debt service coverage ratios updated annually. If we detect an issue in a loan where we have a concern, we would go out and update the appraisals based on what we see in the portfolio, most of our appraisals, our origination based appraisals, and we do not have a vintage chart, but we'll think through that maybe we'll add a vintage chart for our next investor presentation, just to give people a sense, but there's not really a big cluster of loans in any one vintage. One thing I'd mention is that one of the reasons we feel comfortable better at this point is that why that book was originated after COVID. We were very careful to focus on like medical use and things that we thought were long-term durable kinds of office products. So we'll work on that vintage for you.
I'd also point you in the investor deck to the variety of stress tests, we do so we kind of take these loans. We stress test them and then look at the analyze and the debt service coverage ratios post stress, and those hold up really well. So we feel pretty good that whole income side of the equation. We are on top of it. It's very current. The appraisal side would be subject to vintage, but we'll think about getting to the table.

Matthew Breese

Okay. And then, Joe, I think you had mentioned that there's nine and you can correct me if I'm wrong, there's nine office loans over $25 million refer to three of them. I was curious in the other pool of what else is over $25 million or any of those loans that are not passed. And I would I would love to hear your thoughts on why concern and any potential for lost content.

Joseph Lebel

So good news of the a lot of all of all loans are passed and I don't know, unequivocally, I could tell you that at least the top three or four are really happy with. I have to go look at the other ones, but the fact that they're ready to pass tells you tells you pretty much the story we've really had, you know, with the with the one exception in Q whatever Q. three, we've had really good performance in this book and we talked a bunch about it. And we talked a bunch about the fact that a lot of it is suburban markets, very little CBD very little urban period. And I think that's been a beneficiary of the book. And as Chris mentioned, we've got a lot of diversity of the book and geography, medical credit tenant, the whole ball of wax. So I think we we've done what we've done. The money is out is performing immunized, and we're on top of it.

Matthew Breese

And then switching to deposits, how much more cost savings were brokered. Is there kind of targeted to run off? And is the deposit growth guide all in or is it just off of kind of the core deposits, deposit growth guide is all in.

Christopher Maher

And I think that for the most part, we don't have much a brokered. Pat can give you the number, but we're not we're not trying to drive that down quickly or in any material amount. So it shouldn't be much of a headwind. The high-yield savings, I think, to be a little bit more of that running off in Q2, but nothing significant. Then brokerage is just going to wind down over the next several quarters.

Matthew Breese

And then last one for me. Like a lot of your peers are weaving in talent from some recently disrupted institutions, if you will. Are you seeing any of that come your way or is there opportunity to bring in some deposit gathering folks or commercial lending talent down in your neck of the woods?

Christopher Maher

I think there's a great opportunity and it's something we've done over the years and we'll continue to do it. And there are a lot of reasons that people kind of reevaluate where they are. But when you go through periods like this, our really high-quality bankers sometimes have challenges wherever they wherever they are for whatever reason. And we have a lot of conversations and a lot of talk and we've said over the years, I mean it when we find good people, we hire them. And we don't we don't say, gee, we only have a budget for two people this year, but we don't have the opportunity that we don't just hire people because we think we've got to hire three bankers this month or something. So and I would expect you'll see us continue to add talent from there.

Matthew Breese

Yes. And any just any thoughts on how much talent I know, Joe, you had mentioned, I think a handful and I'll leave it there. Thank you.

Joseph Lebel

And I think these were described that we've had with a few already. We have an inside joke in the company that says that we don't have a budget for talent. And as Chris mentioned, all that means is that whenever we find good talent. We're going to trying to hire them.

Christopher Maher

So if we can find good talent will add as many as we can at event for today, it's still going at the kind of the pace you've seen over the last couple of years, a couple of bankers a quarter. If that pace changes, we'll be communicating about it.

Matthew Breese

Perfect. I appreciate it. Thank you.

Christopher Maher

Thanks, Matt.

Operator

Manuel Navas, D.A. Davidson.

Manuel Navas

Hi, good morning. So I'm the core deposit engine? Or are you seeing the CRE C&I lenders that you've brought on actually bring in deposits so far?

Joseph Lebel

Or do you have like a visible pipeline to this point, we are we are seeing them bring in deposits. If anything, they're bringing in deposits before they bring in loans. Because as you all know, sometimes there's limitations or maturities or prepayments that prohibit loans coming over as fast as some deposits early on. And I think I think Manuel will see more and more of that in Q3 and Q4.

Manuel Navas

And that's kind of giving you that confidence to let some of the high yield reprice and runoff a bit higher LTV, Canada.

Christopher Maher

And also we need to understand exactly what those dynamics are So until you start moving rates, you really don't know what that kind of run-up tolerance will be. So and we're beginning that process of moving rates around a little bit. So we know what that marginal pricing should be. We've always been big fans of you can do every deposit survey you want, but the actual experience of pricing and watching deposit flows will tell you exactly what your market is.

Patrick Barrett

We're just trying to make sure we're on top of that can also add that the levers we have a high confidence level in our ability to ramp those back up quickly. You want to whether it's high-interest savings, brokered CDs, certainly our even time deposit specials, retail and or other customer segments. So with that, confidence level, we're feeling a lot better about letting some things mature and roll off not replacing and roll rolling them and starting to dial back some of the highest rates that we've had on offer, and we'll learn from that and be prepared hopefully to see see growth pick up important.

Manuel Navas

I appreciate that color. Can we have a bit of a general update on the operating leverage strategy's been where you sold the trust business, kind of how that fits in?

Christopher Maher

I'd make a couple of comments. First, the trust business sales, strategic partnership where we think that with a partner we can do more in that business than we do today. It's relatively neutral to the P&L. So you're not going to see much change in the P&L.
In terms of the operating leverage strategy, I think the way we're thinking about the Company is that we have now for the most part, fully absorbed all the expenses attendant with coming over $10 billion. Obviously, if you add a banker here there, you've got some expense, but the marginal cost to support growth is quite low. So we are our view here is hold that noninterest expense line allow non interest expense to assets to decrease as we grow, and that's where you're going to see the leverage come in and I think there's a second story from that, which is at some point and I offer no calendar for this. We might have a yield curve that's not inverted.
Right. And at that point, you're going to have the revenue side kind of kick in as well. So that's the guidance about flat expenses doesn't mean that we're going to need to add dollars to grow, we can grow off this expense base. And then this kind of second cylinder that would hit would be at some point down the road. It's regional.

Manuel Navas

Appreciate the commentary Thank you.

Operator

Thank you for your question. There are no additional questions waiting at this time. I would now like to pass the conference back to Chris Maher for any closing remarks.

Christopher Maher

Thank you. Before we close the call, I want to remind everyone that our Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held virtually on May 21st at 8 a.m. Eastern time for the 2024 annual materials. We have transitioned to a notice and access model for all meeting materials, notice and access grants. Stockholders access to the full set of materials electronically by reducing paper, waste and mailings, we're able to decrease operating costs and further our environmental goals as a company. If you have received the notice and would like to receive a printed version of our proxy materials. Please follow the instructions provided on your notice and submit your request prior to May 7, 2024. If you have any questions or need any assistance with requesting these materials, please don't hesitate to contact us. We encourage stockholders of record on March 25th, 2024 to review the proxy materials and vote your shares. We appreciate your time today and your continued support of OceanFirst Financial Corp. We look forward to speaking with you during our Annual Stockholders Meeting on May 21st. Thank you.

Operator

That concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation and enjoy the rest of your day.