Outdoor gear retailer Beneunder sparks ire of Communist Party mouthpiece People's Daily as it seeks Hong Kong IPO
An article in the People's Daily, the mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party, recently questioned a company seeking to list its shares in Hong Kong, a rare move that has baffled some analysts and may affect the firm's chances of a successful IPO.
The piece accused outdoor gear retailer Beneunder of wasting revenues on advertising, particularly by paying large amounts to famous online influencers to push its products. It said the company's marketing costs had increased by more than 10 times over the past three years.
"The company's revenue increased a lot in the past years while delivering a rather small profit. The marketing cost is its major expenditure, according to its IPO prospectus ... and a rather big chunk of the company's revenue was pocketed by live-streaming top influencers," said the article, which appeared in the newspaper's capital market observations section on June 8.
Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.
The Post has approached Beneunder for comment.
Shenzhen-based Beneunder, which started out in 2013 producing umbrellas for protection against the sun, recorded revenues of 2.41 billion yuan (US$359 million) in 2021, up 67 per cent year-on-year, and delivered an adjusted profit of 136 million yuan.
"It is unclear why a mouthpiece media [outlet] commented on one particular company waiting for listing like this," said Jeffrey Chan Lap-tak, a founding partner at Oriental Patron Financial Group, a Hong Kong-based firm. "Having light assets and paying a lot on branding seems more than common among current new-economy firms at an early stage to boost their presence."
The designer toymaker Pop Mart International Group, which went public in Hong Kong at the end of 2020, for example, reported a 20 times surge in its marketing and advertising costs in the three years prior to listing, according to its IPO prospectus.
"You can argue about whether such a business model is sustainable or not. But it seems not a solid enough [reason] to slam its IPO like that, only based on its business model," said Chan. "Of course, there might be other things that we do not know."
Indeed, some market observers believe the real reason for the scathing critique may lie in Beneunder's use of live-streaming as a marketing tool.
Beijing has clamped down heavily on the live-streaming e-commerce sector.