Unlock stock picks and a broker-level newsfeed that powers Wall Street. Upgrade Now
Exclusive-T. Rowe, Columbia Threadneedle push back against some high-yield debt sponsors
Logo of T. Rowe Price Group is pictured at its office in Tokyo · Reuters

By Shankar Ramakrishnan

(Reuters) - Asset managers T. Rowe Price and Columbia Threadneedle are pushing back against private equity firms that pursued aggressive debt raises in a practice that hurt high-yield debt investors over the past two years.

Portfolio managers at the two firms who oversee investments in high-yield debt told Reuters that they now either outright refuse to entertain debt sales involving some firms or demand a lot more protections before investing.

"We have a blacklist of sponsors that have done a number of LMEs in the last two years," said Vesa Tontti, senior portfolio manager at Columbia Threadneedle Investments, who is part of the U.S. loan team that manages $4.3 billion of assets.

"When my analyst comes to me asking about investing in debt being offered by some sponsors on that list, it is a straight no.”

T. Rowe Price, meanwhile, has refused to take part in debt trades backed by firms in the past even on suspicion that they may do debt raises on the side that would dilute their claims on assets, said Kevin Loome, U.S. high-yield portfolio manager at the investor.

"A healthy dose of skepticism is required when underwriting credits to ensure prudent longer-term risk management," said Loome, who manages $2.8 billion in assets.

The caution from these two major institutional investors, which has not been previously reported, follows a practice over the past two years that came to be known as “creditor on creditor violence.”

'LIABILITY MANAGEMENT EXERCISE'

The maneuver involved companies transferring valuable assets that were not tied to existing debt into a subsidiary, which would then raise new debt. The practice, euphemistically known as a liability management exercise, left the original lenders to the company at a disadvantage, as it undermined their claims to the company’s assets in a bankruptcy.

Private equity firms were particularly aggressive in using such tactics, as it allowed them to raise cash to return to investors at a time when they were unable to sell or float their portfolio companies on public markets.

The pushback from the investors is rare for a market that has allowed private equity firms to raise debt with weak investor protections. Some 90% of senior loans were considered covenant-lite or lacking adequate protections, according to varied estimates by analysts.

That’s in part because the issuers of such debt have had the upper hand. With the Federal Reserve expected to lower interest rates in the coming months, investors have been eager to get their hands on junk debt, which pays juicy returns.