In This Article:
NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / May 31, 2021 / Levi & Korsinsky, LLP announces that class action lawsuits have commenced on behalf of shareholders of the following publicly-traded companies. Shareholders interested in serving as lead plaintiff have until the deadlines listed to petition the court. Further details about the cases can be found at the links provided. There is no cost or obligation to you.
FGEN Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/fibrogen-inc-information-request-form?prid=16385&wire=1
DOX Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/amdocs-limited-loss-submission-form?prid=16385&wire=1
CCIV Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/churchill-capital-corp-iv-information-request-form?prid=16385&wire=1
* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BELOW *
FibroGen, Inc. (NASDAQ:FGEN)
FGEN Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased October 18, 2017 - April 6, 2021
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : June 11, 2021
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/fibrogen-inc-information-request-form?prid=16385&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, during the class period, FibroGen, Inc. made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company's prior disclosures of U.S. primary cardiovascular safety analyses from the roxadustat Phase 3 program for the treatment of anemia certain safety analyses submitted in connection with CKD included post-hoc changes to the stratification factors; (ii) FibroGen's analyses with the pre-specified stratification factors result in higher hazard ratios (point estimates of relative risk) and 95% confidence intervals; (iii) based on these analyses the Company could not conclude that roxadustat reduces the risk of (or is superior to) MACE+ in dialysis, and MACE and MACE+ in incident dialysis compared to epoetin-alfa; (iv) as a result, the Company faced significant uncertainty that its NDA for roxadustat as a treatment for anemia of CKD would be approved by the FDA; and (v) as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
Amdocs Limited (NASDAQ:DOX)
DOX Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased December 13, 2016 - March 30, 2021
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : June 8, 2021
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/amdocs-limited-loss-submission-form?prid=16385&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, during the class period, Amdocs Limited made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Amdocs overstated its profits, cash, and liquidity, while understating its debt; (ii) Amdocs concealed its large borrowing; (iii) while Amdocs' reported results showed that its North American business was stable, that business was actually deteriorating annually, in part because the Company was losing AT&T as a customer; and (iv) as a result, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.